Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales still not sold on Bryce?


Jackson113.2
 Share

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

I could do better, those that know, know.

You’re just not worth the effort. a crybaby reactionary thread to the Johnson trade and then hounding every poster personally that disagreed with you said everything. You’re just childish, nothing more needs to be said.

Ps. How many yards does Johnson have with the Ravens again? 6 yards through two games?

Oh, you mean the thread where you kept asking people for evidence of poor decision-making, then you kept receiving evidence repeatedly and you rage-quit the thread? That one?

Keep up the projecting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

A)again growth is relative to where he was.  He was basically the worst starting qb in the history of the modern nfl last year and through 2 games this season.  Has he improved from that?  Yeah sure but he is still the worst qb in the nfl right now

 

B) for fugs sake please stop playing the what if game.  The ebbs and flows are penalites and dropped passes are part of it, you dont get credit for that.  And if you do you need to factor in the poo throws he gets away with

Whoa!!! Take it easy. I'm only trying to give a little perspective. Good QBs with good WRs aren't really lighting up the Giants in the passing game. 

Bryce has been improving every week for the last 3 games. Agreed that his starting point was pretty freakin low, but at this point he isn't going in the wrong direction like the first 2 games. 

I get your take on him. You don't have to keep reminding everyone. I think almost everyone here agrees that he needs a lot of improvement to be handed the keys to the franchise. At this point, he's what we have. And Bryce Young figuring it out is the best thing for the Carolina Panthers. You don't have to agree. It's just the truth. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

you don't get to play the 27th and 29th worst run Ds most weeks in the NFL. 

this week Bryce will go back to looking like a middle schooler.  KC is 3rd vs the run.   Which means it will be a couple hours of check downs and sacks. 

We actually have the 31st and 32nd ranked rush defenses still to play!

Also the 32nd passing defense x2.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Whoa!!! Take it easy. I'm only trying to give a little perspective. Good QBs with good WRs aren't really lighting up the Giants in the passing game. 

Bryce has been improving every week for the last 3 games. Agreed that his starting point was pretty freakin low, but at this point he isn't going in the wrong direction like the first 2 games. 

I get your take on him. You don't have to keep reminding everyone. I think almost everyone here agrees that he needs a lot of improvement to be handed the keys to the franchise. At this point, he's what we have. And Bryce Young figuring it out is the best thing for the Carolina Panthers. You don't have to agree. It's just the truth. 

Problem with that assessment is that bryce is out of runway.  Incremental baby steps isnt solving anything for planning and the future.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Problem with that assessment is that bryce is out of runway.  Incremental baby steps isnt solving anything for planning and the future.

100%. If this is the point he is at developmentally this far into his career, he is likely better off spending more time on the bench and doing that slow development.

His best path to success is a Geno Smith-like one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After we were at 10 points, our drives were as follows:

3 plays, 0 yards, punt

3 plays, 6 yards, punt

6 plays, 22 yards, punt

10 plays, 80 yards, TD (nice drive)

3 plays, 3 yards, punt

1 play, -8 yards, fumble (on a non-call horsecollar)

3 plays, 8 yards, punt

6 plays, 13 yards, punt

4 plays, 5 yards, punt

You need to have more than 3 legit scoring drives per NFL game.  The drive stalling were not all on Bryce, but he couldn't find guys at times to sustain drives.  We had plenty of opportunities against the worst defense in the league and that's what we produced.  

Nice to see a win, but the continued concerns with Bryce are absolutely valid.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

Oh, you mean the thread where you kept asking people for evidence of poor decision-making, then you kept receiving evidence repeatedly and you rage-quit the thread? That one?

Keep up the projecting.

Rage quit? No, I just realized you were not worth the time. 

As far as evidence goes, you mean the vast majority of your evidence which happened with Fitterer at the wheel not Dan? Your entire argument against Dan is based on “guilt by association” which is dumb as hell. There isn’t an argument too that, it’s a dumb emotion based argument that’s it. 
 

Big ole “Yawn” from me on that one. Lmao

this is teh internets jabroni, not every idiot’s idea needs to be fought to death. It just got to the point where i realized nothing I said was gonna change your mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Problem with that assessment is that bryce is out of runway.  Incremental baby steps isnt solving anything for planning and the future.

So he's out of runway after 5 games into his 2nd season, after he was picked #1 overall? Now that would be such a Panthers thing to do. If he's showing steady improvement, and doing the things that we thought he couldn't do last season and the first 2 games this season, then he needs to develop consistency. That's a better approach than running out to get another new QB that may or may not work out. 

Look. He's played horribly for the vast majority of his short career, but if he consistently shows improvement while winning games, then you don't just move on because he used to suck really bad. Particularly when he's still not in a desirable situation to put up numbers. Either way, continue to build the team. And when the team is good, then get the rookie QB if you need to. Until then, Bryce is showing enough development that he doesn't hinder the development of other players. Actually our young offensive players look better with Bryce than with Dalton. As soon as that isn't the case, he needs to go. Post haste. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...