Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Currently at pick #4


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

How far do you all think Mason Graham could possibly fall in the draft. Him and Brown together could cure the Dline woes big time.

If they do win one or two more games, that may put them of contention for him.

If they could snatch him and a quality DE in this draft, defense would be stout and become a force.

Find a LB in the draft or FA and possibly a corner, they would be sitting pretty. I know they have to fiqure out a WR 1 and another running back. They have alot of picks to find the RB. 

They will have to fiqure out if they can find a WR In FA.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Not overly impressed with tmac honestly 

 

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I am not completely sold either.  I like him but would really like to see him run sub4.5 at some point.  I think we need WR pretty bad though 

@tukafan21 in shambles.

 

Hunter just won the Biletnikoff award as well. Not bad for the 3rd best WR prospect in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

 

@tukafan21 in shambles.

 

Hunter just won the Biletnikoff award as well. Not bad for the 3rd best WR prospect in the draft.

I honestly didn't think T-Mac was going to win the award anyways, but it being Hunter is absolutely shocking to me and makes literally zero sense.

Nash won the triple crown, he lead the nation in catches, yards, and TDs (as well as having more yards per reception than Hunter too).  I'm not collegiate historian, but I have a feeling it's very rare for any player to win the triple crown in college, just far too many players out there putting up video game numbers at this level for someone to be tops in all 3.

I said all year how T-Mac's stats were being held back by his QB play, play calling, and overall state of the team.  That he still was 3rd in the nation in yards was ridiculous if you watched every Arizona game this year and saw how much of a mess we were (especially compared to last year).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Martin said:

I might be wrong, but I think they give the award based on their play in college and not how they project to the NFL.

Yep, and as I just said in my previous post, I didn't expect him to win it, his stats have been depressed all year because of the team.

Put T-Mac in that Colorado offense this year though and he's putting up bigger numbers than Hunter did.  He had more yards and yards per catch than him on a worse team with nobody else to take coverage from him and a worse QB, he's have crushed it in Colorado.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To my point about the numbers T-Mac would have put up if he was there instead of Hunter

T-Mac had 84 rec, 1,319 yds, 8 TDs

Hunter had 92 rec, 1,152 yds, 14 TDs

Shedeur had 1,000 more yards and 17 more TDs than T-Mac's QB... on only 24 more attempts on the entire season.

The 2nd highest receiving yardage by any Arizona player was a WR with 323 yards, after that it was a RB with 245 and a TE with 217... nobody else had over 196.

Colorado had WRs with 880, 617, 617, 434, 277, and 216

Arizona had 10 receiving TDs other than T-Mac... Colorado had 21 other than Hunter

T-Mac also only had 5% more of Arizona's catches than Hunter had, so it's not like you can say T-Mac's numbers are because of volume.  They spread the ball around plenty, but there was nobody else who could make plays or even scare the defense into not sending extra guys T-Mac's way.  

Put him in that offense with a better QB, scheme, and other WRs to make sure he can't be double or tripled on every single snap, the numbers he'd have put up would have been absolutely crazy and people would be talking about him as the second coming.

 

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

To my point about the numbers T-Mac would have put up if he was there instead of Hunter

T-Mac had 84 rec, 1,319 yds, 8 TDs

Hunter had 92 rec, 1,152 yds, 14 TDs

Shedeur had 1,000 more yards and 17 more TDs than T-Mac's QB... on only 24 more attempts on the entire season.

The 2nd highest receiving yardage by any Arizona player was a WR with 323 yards, after that it was a RB with 245 and a TE with 217... nobody else had over 196.

Colorado had WRs with 880, 617, 617, 434, 277, and 216

Arizona had 10 receiving TDs other than T-Mac... Colorado had 21 other than Hunter

T-Mac also only had 5% more of Arizona's catches than Hunter had, so it's not like you can say T-Mac's numbers are because of volume.  They spread the ball around plenty, but there was nobody else who could make plays or even scare the defense into not sending extra guys T-Mac's way.  

Put him in that offense with a better QB, scheme, and other WRs to make sure he can't be double or tripled on every single snap, the numbers he'd have put up would have been absolutely crazy and people would be talking about him as the second coming.

 

I just don't see it, he looks like a possession reciever in the NFL

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

I just don't see it, he looks like a possession reciever in the NFL

Don't get me wrong, he's great at the 10 yard crossing routes to pick up a first down, his big body and hands allow him to excel doing that.

But the thing he does best is make big plays downfield because of his ability to make contested catches, he's a guy that you can throw to even when he's covered and have a decent chance of him coming down with the ball over the defenders.

Thielen is a possession WR, T-Mac is nothing like him.

The popular comps are Evans, London, Higgins because they are all current players, but to me, he's always reminded me of AJ Green, who again, is no possession WR

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...