Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Tankathon Approach to the remaining Schedule


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

That's a pretty good comp. I think he has really good extended play making/throwing on run under pressure abilities, but it's hard to make a living on that in the NFL. The one wild card he has going, is he has had access to the best training/coaching/etc. since the day he was born. That has to be a huge advantage.

And yet with all those advantages he doesn't show any plus traits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MHS831 said:

INTERESTING

The Giants are the only 2-win team.  Due to the Giants' strength of schedule, it is possible for them to win 1 game and drop to seventh in the draft.

Having said that, I am confident the Giants will not win another game. 

Having said that, I am not sure I would be happy in this draft with the #1 overall pick knowing that I needed a QB.  I have more confidence in Ward than Sanders, but, in my opinion, neither is ready to play in 2025.

So about that......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

As long as we are in position to draft Tmac we should be fine. We can go all defense the rest of the draft.

 

Instead of overpaying Higgins we can use that money on 2 possible starters on defense. Think smart Panthers.

I think Tmac is a stud as well, my only question is do you think he fits in with our WR corps/Bryce?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Well we have no elite WR on the roster, so why would he not?

WR corps are like a basketball starting 5,  you need a balanced group. Coker, Leggette both are vertical receivers which is a role Tmac excells in. I love Tmac the prospect, and wouldn’t be mad at the pick but personally I think our assets would be better used on a smaller faster slot option later in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shaq said:

WR corps are like a basketball starting 5,  you need a balanced group. Coker, Leggette both are vertical receivers which is a role Tmac excells in. I love Tmac the prospect, and wouldn’t be mad at the pick but personally I think our assets would be better used on a smaller faster slot option later in the draft.

Legette is a 3rd WR at best(likely a 4th or 5th). Coker is basically a AT replacement. He isn't blowing the top off any defenses.

The closest thing we have to an elite WR is AT. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...