Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mason Graham at NT?


Martin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Graham is a bit bigger that the traditional NT Evero likes to use, but he might be a great fit for the traits Evero like at that position. I’m slight intrigued by the idea, and I think Graham might be there when we pick. 
 

Jalon Walker is probably my preferred choice, but if Graham is a fit at NT…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, AU-panther said:

I hope we don't pass on a great player because of the "fit" of a coach and system that might not be here in the future.

 

100 % agree, he would be awesome as a 3-4 end, but I think he might work as a NT as well, so I was curious about other people see it. Just a very impactful player that I think might be there when we pick, but we’ll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Maybe on 3rd and long or other long yardage downs. To me he's like a classic 3tech. I don't want him trying to take on double teams, I want him in 1 vs 1. His talents would be wasted at NT and I do not think he could hold this ground as NT.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not a fan of drafting a NT in round 1. Your 3 Techs are your better athletes, in general, but there have been exceptions.

 A player that does fit the Evero mold for a NT is Walter Nolan of Ole Miss.  He is a hair under 300 and is projected to be effective at both the three tech and NT positions.  Some argue that playing him at NT is a waste of his talents, however, and a NT in round 1 is a reach, imo.  He is projected to be drafted late first.

Deone Walker out of Kentucky is a freakish athlete in that he can play every DL position and he is 6'6" and 345.  A bit raw, he has the skill set Evero covets, assuming his size is not a deal breaker. He has a second-round grade.

I have to think we try to sign a veteran or go with Shy again (hope not).  Either way, the NT they may covet (considering all other needs) is Omarr Norman-Lott, a player who could drop to the early 4th round. He is effective from the 0, 1, or 3 tech positions.  Has good first step quickness (4 sacks in 2024).  Needs to work on technique like all others, can get washed.  Smart player--high football IQ.

Finally, I would draft Tyleik Williams of Ohio State in round 2 if he were to somehow fall that far.  He is a great bull rusher and has freakish speed and power to play any DL position--from 0 to 5 tech.  He needs to work on some things, as they all do, but few have the ceiling Williams has.  I would interview him to see if he is a dawg and is willing to work hard to be the best because he has the tools to be great.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2025 at 8:10 AM, AU-panther said:

I hope we don't pass on a great player because of the "fit" of a coach and system that might not be here in the future.

 

Even if we go back to a 4-3 Graham could play tackle or end

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s the top of my board and if he is there I hope we take him. He would be BPA at a position we desperately need and I think would make a huge impact on the quality of play we see from other players in the front seven. He and DB returning would make a subpar LB group look much much better. I’m not smart enough to know about his scheme fit, but I’m more interested in culture-fit. If he really isa “dawg” and fits into the culture, I’m confident he will make a big impact. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I thought about is that when we drafted 95 a lot of the rhetoric was: never draft a DT top 10 unless they can rush the passer. Things have changed since then and interior pressure is so valuable now. However do we think Graham is the level of prospect Jalen Carter was, because if so he's a no brainer for me. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/23/2025 at 5:20 PM, Basbear said:

 

Maybe on 3rd and long or other long yardage downs. To me he's like a classic 3tech. I don't want him trying to take on double teams, I want him in 1 vs 1. His talents would be wasted at NT and I do not think he could hold this ground as NT.

 

I agree -would not play him at NT---3 or 5 tech.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's one of the most versatile DL in the draft. I do think he's a bit more of a RDE opposite of Brown, but he could play the nose because of his athleticism. I think he gives you pass rush from the interior and is definitely the most gap sound/run stuffer in the draft. Carolina could not stop the run and that must be addressed first. They've got to nail down the front 7. In the 3-4 front he's perfect though, because that DE is going to be a more athletic DT, he can play the 3 if they slide into a eagle front, and then is a perfect 4 technique. I think hes far better than A'shawn, and would be lightyears ahead of Tuttle who just tries to stalemate guys. The zero really needs to be a wardaddy and be more finesse than most think because they are 2 gapping. He's #2 for me if Abdul is gone which is very likely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The following teams have or are expected to hold formals with Michigan DT Mason Graham this week, per sources.

• Saints • Patriots • Cardinals • Jets • Raiders • Jaguars • Giants • Browns

 

 

hmm no Panthers, I am a little shocked.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not a Bryce hater and I would 100% move on.  Especially looking at how the upcoming qb draft looks on paper.  Hopefully he continues to improve but if in 3 seasons you're still chasing average season numbers then he's not going to be the guy.  You've just got to keep taking swings until you hit.  Average qbs without any elite physical traits cant get it done anymore.  So this year Hopefully he continues to develop and is above average statistically.
    • Meltdowns???? He was pulled by Canales because he wasn't executing the game plan after 2 games into the season so he could watch Dalton execute the offense and show Bryce the windows available in the NFL, how to push the ball down the field and how to step up and move around when blitzed. When Young came back 5 games later he clearly watched and improved. Enough he was named the future starter. He doesn't have a history of  meltdowns nor is there any reason to assume he will have one. From what I have read he is mentally strong and emotional stable. He may have bad games down the road, everyone does. But this is all a learning experience for him and so far he seems to be making progress. I can understand being hesitant on anything Panthers, but Young has surprisingly been able to gain his confidence after a disastrous start. You aren't alone in being cautious but I think he is the future. I thought he was too small and too short to succeed in the NFL. Honestly I was pleasantly surprised last year and am optimistic about the offense for the first time since Wilks and Dalton were decent.
    • The Rams wanted to trade up for Williams who they ended up within the end. They even told him that when they called him to let him know he is the pick. The other teams are only an assumption. Like the Cowboys, who took a guard. The truth is the team wanted to trade down first and foremost but couldn't get an offer the were happy with. They took McMillan because they felt he was bpa at 8 plain and simple. 
×
×
  • Create New...