Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING NEWS: Panthers hiring new coach


Recommended Posts

According to Mike Kaye of The Charlotte Observer, the team is expected to hire former cornerback Kevin Peterson as a defensive assistant.

 

Peterson spent this past year as the cornerbacks coach for Colorado State University Pueblo.

Before hitting the sidelines for the ThunderWolves in 2024, Peterson spent the prior season with both the Los Angeles Rams and Arizona Cardinals as a Bill Walsh Diversity Coaching Fellow.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/6/2025 at 7:29 AM, Khyber53 said:

Good! Hope he does great here!

And if the Bill Walsh Diversity Coaching Fellow was his route to becoming a successful coach then great! The league won't survive long if we go back to the old days when there was a bottleneck to access that prevented skilled people from different backgrounds from getting the opportunity to coach.

And fug Trump.

Aside from your personal opinions on Trump, what bottlenecks exist that prevent qualified people from having success? If the candidate is talented and successful in what he has done already, there’s no reason to think he wouldn’t be considered for the job. What does the color of someone’s skin have to do with anything?
 

From what I can tell, diversity hires only block qualified talent and lowers standards. 
 

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OceanRider said:

Aside from your personal opinions on Trump, what bottlenecks exist that prevent qualified people from having success? If the candidate is talented and successful in what he has done already, there’s no reason to think he wouldn’t be considered for the job. What does the color of someone’s skin have to do with anything?
 

From what I can tell, diversity hires only block qualified talent and lowers standards. 

or they put optics on someone that otherwise would have been overlooked despite being talented enough for the job. not everyone who has talent is given a fair opportunity. it doesn't hurt to open up the talent pool beyond what people with limited vision would otherwise have made available to them.

it doesn't block talent. it widens the pool of talent and does nothing to affect the standards.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, OceanRider said:

Aside from your personal opinions on Trump, what bottlenecks exist that prevent qualified people from having success? If the candidate is talented and successful in what he has done already, there’s no reason to think he wouldn’t be considered for the job. What does the color of someone’s skin have to do with anything?
 

From what I can tell, diversity hires only block qualified talent and lowers standards. 
 

 

Actually, before the Rooney rule came into effect, followed by a number of efforts to increase diversity, the NFL coaching ranks suffered from a massive disparity between the people coaching teams and the teams they coached. If you weren't a white man, you weren't getting any coaching jobs up until the last two decades with some very, very rare exceptions.

The first minority head coach was Fritz Pollard in 1921 of the Arkon Pros. Almost 70 years later, the first black head coach would be Art Shell of the Oakland Raiders in 1989. Then it was Dennis Green in Minnesota beginning in 1992. Shell and Green would have good to decent careers as head coaches as would Philadelphia's Ray Rhodes (who would also coach the Green Bay Packers). Rhodes would even win Coach of the Year in 1995. Tony Dungy would begin coaching the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in 1996. 

Each of those men fought through a good ol' boys network that kept coaching jobs for white men and made it to the top, and they were used to it, having been almost as rare at the coordinator and lower coaching positions as well throughout their careers. How hard it was for them to make it led to the Rooney Rule, requiring NFL teams to interview at least one minority candidate for coaching jobs. The rule stands today.

It does not require hiring a minority. It just guarantees that at least one minority candidate gets to come to the table and make the best case for themself. And honestly, minority hires have risen and the quality of football has grown with it. NFL coaching is beginning to look not just like it's player base, but it's fanbase as well. Ticket sales are through the roof, the viewership has grown explosively over the last two decades and international interest is skyrocketing.

Is diversity what caused this? It's part of it. The product has gotten better and with any business, that's what it is all about: better product, better returns, better feature. 

Now, I've given my answer. How about you answer one for me?

Has the inclusion of black coaches, Hispanic coaches, mixed race coaches and female coaches harmed the game. And if so, how? 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Actually, before the Rooney rule came into effect, followed by a number of efforts to increase diversity, the NFL coaching ranks suffered from a massive disparity between the people coaching teams and the teams they coached. If you weren't a white man, you weren't getting any coaching jobs up until the last two decades with some very, very rare exceptions.

The first minority head coach was Fritz Pollard in 1921 of the Arkon Pros. Almost 70 years later, the first black head coach would be Art Shell of the Oakland Raiders in 1989. Then it was Dennis Green in Minnesota beginning in 1992. Shell and Green would have good to decent careers as head coaches as would Philadelphia's Ray Rhodes (who would also coach the Green Bay Packers). Rhodes would even win Coach of the Year in 1995. Tony Dungy would begin coaching the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in 1996. 

Each of those men fought through a good ol' boys network that kept coaching jobs for white men and made it to the top, and they were used to it, having been almost as rare at the coordinator and lower coaching positions as well throughout their careers. How hard it was for them to make it led to the Rooney Rule, requiring NFL teams to interview at least one minority candidate for coaching jobs. The rule stands today.

It does not require hiring a minority. It just guarantees that at least one minority candidate gets to come to the table and make the best case for themself. And honestly, minority hires have risen and the quality of football has grown with it. NFL coaching is beginning to look not just like it's player base, but it's fanbase as well. Ticket sales are through the roof, the viewership has grown explosively over the last two decades and international interest is skyrocketing.

Is diversity what caused this? It's part of it. The product has gotten better and with any business, that's what it is all about: better product, better returns, better feature. 

Now, I've given my answer. How about you answer one for me?

Has the inclusion of black coaches, Hispanic coaches, mixed race coaches and female coaches harmed the game. And if so, how? 

 

You know, I'm sorry. I don't mean to try and put a stumbling block in front of you brother.

I just very, very much believe that We the People, is best served by allowing all of us to be part of the We, and not just a select few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Actually, before the Rooney rule came into effect, followed by a number of efforts to increase diversity, the NFL coaching ranks suffered from a massive disparity between the people coaching teams and the teams they coached. If you weren't a white man, you weren't getting any coaching jobs up until the last two decades with some very, very rare exceptions.

The first minority head coach was Fritz Pollard in 1921 of the Arkon Pros. Almost 70 years later, the first black head coach would be Art Shell of the Oakland Raiders in 1989. Then it was Dennis Green in Minnesota beginning in 1992. Shell and Green would have good to decent careers as head coaches as would Philadelphia's Ray Rhodes (who would also coach the Green Bay Packers). Rhodes would even win Coach of the Year in 1995. Tony Dungy would begin coaching the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in 1996. 

Each of those men fought through a good ol' boys network that kept coaching jobs for white men and made it to the top, and they were used to it, having been almost as rare at the coordinator and lower coaching positions as well throughout their careers. How hard it was for them to make it led to the Rooney Rule, requiring NFL teams to interview at least one minority candidate for coaching jobs. The rule stands today.

It does not require hiring a minority. It just guarantees that at least one minority candidate gets to come to the table and make the best case for themself. And honestly, minority hires have risen and the quality of football has grown with it. NFL coaching is beginning to look not just like it's player base, but it's fanbase as well. Ticket sales are through the roof, the viewership has grown explosively over the last two decades and international interest is skyrocketing.

Is diversity what caused this? It's part of it. The product has gotten better and with any business, that's what it is all about: better product, better returns, better feature. 

Now, I've given my answer. How about you answer one for me?

Has the inclusion of black coaches, Hispanic coaches, mixed race coaches and female coaches harmed the game. And if so, how? 

 

No, not at all. Some of sports greatest ever are people from all backgrounds, not just “white.” Coaches included. I don’t even think I could name a NFL coach of color who I believe that they are in the position for any reason other than merit and sharing a common interest in winning with their respective management. 

 

I would argue that the act of forcing diversity hires would harm any organization. Just bad practice all around. I understand the Rooney rule only requires that there is consideration and interviews with minority candidates. I don’t have a real big problem with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing wrong with starting to look for bodies early. It's a long injury filled season. I doubt we get through unscathed. 
    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...