Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Front Office got into Steve Smiths Head


chknwing

Recommended Posts

The league did not ban TD celebrations - they did come up with some rules such as the football couldn't be used as a prop and no orchestrated team celebrations. SS did quit the planned celebrations because of setting an example for his kids AND Keyshawn had suggested that he should act like he had gotten TDs before and would again.

That's our girl....putting all of these little newbs in their place.

Get out your pencils and notepads kids....Cosmo has forgotten more about this team and football that most of you wil lever know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until Smith gets a career ending injury or looses his speed he will be the same aggressive WR we have always had. We attempted to get a Steve Smith replacement, Ryne Robinson was a bust, Armanti Edwards is the new experiment and hopefully will work out for us. We don't know how many more years Smith has left but the staff knows Smith is a game changing WR that is a rare find. Without him our passing game is nothing. Joey Galloway was a WR that made plays with his speed. He lasted until 2007 age 36 so if he can avoid injuries we could keep him another 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve no longer has HEART!

And if there's anything I've learned from the Huddle and James Cameron movies is that HEART! is the only thing that matters when it comes to winning.

You're the life of this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...