Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tyler Warren


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

his stats:   

Shockey had a combined 248 catches, 3000 yards and 17 tds his first 4 years.

 

He never had a 100 yeard season and never had double digit tds

 

Rookie year stats:  If thats all pro then sure

GP GS       Rec        Yds        Avg       Lng           TD
5      14      74        894        12.1        30

        2

 

If you think that is first round worthy then we have to agree to disagree

To be fair, that's double the yards legette had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Icege said:

What games did you feel stuck out poorly on film? He looked like a man amongst boys vs. USC and Purdue and was clearly the best player on the Penn State offense in the postseason.

Yes his size is impressive and he looks solid which is good. He doesn't look like a freak and the NFL has tons of freaks. 

I don't care about the games. I just look at the film. Being the best player at Penn state means nothing in the NFL, it's just supporting info in the draft process. If he isn't going to be playing for for CFB coaches and agaisnt CFB players it's a moot point. He is big and he should be good in the NFL but comparing him to Bowers or saying he is a better prospect is not something I can agree with from what I have seen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

thats not true,  you have to play the odds and the odds say te's are bottom of the barrel in busting relative to where they were picked

 

We just did this, in 24 years 24 have been picked in the first round, in your opinion who was worthy?

You know, I'm torn on how to do this post, so I'll go with both options. Up first:

boom smile GIF

We've done it!

And second:

This Christmas GIF by filmeditor

Are you coping well enough?

Now on to the rest of the post.

We've successfully moved at least some of mrcompletely11's disdain and hatred from I Love You Football GIF by Carolina Panthers

to the idea of Warren at #8. Take a bow fellas

Jim Carrey Reaction GIF by Laff

Edited by jayboogieman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

his stats:   

Shockey had a combined 248 catches, 3000 yards and 17 tds his first 4 years.

 

He never had a 1000 yard season and never had double digit tds

 

Rookie year stats:  If thats all pro then sure

GP GS       Rec        Yds        Avg       Lng           TD
5      14      74        894        12.1        30

        2

 

If you think that is first round worthy then we have to agree to disagree


“never had 1k yard season”

 

 

Go look at the receiving stats from the TEs around that time period.

 

Antonio Gates who is about to go in the HOF only had 2 1k seasons out of 15 seasons.

they weren’t airing it out like today.  If he played in todays game where guys are attempting 40 passing  vs 25 back then when they were more focused on RBs and the run game.

 

There is a reason he was 1st team all-pro

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Yes his size is impressive and he looks solid which is good. He doesn't look like a freak and the NFL has tons of freaks. 

I don't care about the games. I just look at the film. Being the best player at Penn state means nothing in the NFL, it's just supporting info in the draft process. If he isn't going to be playing for for CFB coaches and agaisnt CFB players it's a moot point. He is big and he should be good in the NFL but comparing him to Bowers or saying he is a better prospect is not something I can agree with from what I have seen. 

You've fallen into the trap. You're looking for an athlete and not a football player.😮

Warren has improved every year in college and can play the game and produce at a high level. That's all you can really ask for from a prospect.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Go look at the receiving stats from the TEs around that time period.

they weren’t airing it out like today.  If he played in todays game where guys are attempting 40 passing  vs 25 back then when they were more focused on RBs and the run game.

 

There is a reason he was 1st team all-pro

passing attempts 2002 = 33

passing attempts 2024 = 32

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

passing attempts 2002 = 33

passing attempts 2024 = 32

“He didn’t have a 1k yard Season”

 

Up coming HOF TE Antonio Gates had 2 1 Thousand yard seasons out of 15.

 

TE’s weren’t utilized like today as much in the passing game despite their ability 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ncfan said:

“He didn’t have a 1k yard Season”

 

Up coming HOF TE Antonio Gates had 2 1 Thousand yard seasons out of 15.

 

TE’s weren’t utilized like today as much in the passing game despite their ability 

dont move the goalposts, first you say the attempts per game were 40 vs 25 (wrong) now you want to focus on the tight ends.

 

I mean you guys can simply ignore the stats/data all you want but its patently clear taking a te in the first is a fools errand and taking one in the top 10 is sheer insanity which should lead to immediate termination

 

If you think he is a unicorn cool let some other team gamble with a less then 10% hit rate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Yes his size is impressive and he looks solid which is good. He doesn't look like a freak and the NFL has tons of freaks. 

I don't care about the games. I just look at the film. Being the best player at Penn state means nothing in the NFL, it's just supporting info in the draft process. If he isn't going to be playing for for CFB coaches and agaisnt CFB players it's a moot point. He is big and he should be good in the NFL but comparing him to Bowers or saying he is a better prospect is not something I can agree with from what I have seen. 

Little confused here. I get that you recognize his size, but I don't understand the comment about not caring about the games and only the film. The games ARE the film. Are you going based off of his highlights? Completely fair as we are just armchair GMs that might only have time for a 5min reel while using the bathroom.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

You've fallen into the trap. You're looking for an athlete and not a football player.😮

Warren has improved every year in college and can play the game and produce at a high level. That's all you can really ask for from a prospect.

No Bowers looks like the better athlete and player. It's not just physical, even if i did compare those aspects. I called Bowers a freak. He is a playmaker. Warren reminds me of Legette where people were gushing over him and brushing the body catches and lack of agility as issues when transitioning to the NFL. I think you have fallen into the trap that school ball is close to NFL ball where they might as well be different games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Icege said:

Little confused here. I get that you recognize his size, but I don't understand the comment about not caring about the games and only the film. The games ARE the film. Are you going based off of his highlights? Completely fair as we are just armchair GMs that might only have time for a 5min reel while using the bathroom.

No the games are the coaches, players and situation. The film is looking at the prospect and then seeing g if those things add value to an assessment. I don't even look at their records because it usually doesn't matter. The games are more than film, they are a bunch of stuff going on and lots of it doesn't matter anymore once they are drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

dont move the goalposts, first you say the attempts per game were 40 vs 25 (wrong) now you want to focus on the tight ends.

 

I mean you guys can simply ignore the stats/data all you want but its patently clear taking a te in the first is a fools errand and taking one in the top 10 is sheer insanity which should lead to immediate termination

 

If you think he is a unicorn cool let some other team gamble with a less then 10% hit rate

I simply answered you initial statement that he didn’t do anything his first 4 years.

when he made 1st team all pro in his first year (which all-pro isn’t some fan vote Gimik) Over guys like Gates etc.

So yes

He did do something his first 4 seasons.

if you can get a 1st team all-pro rookie year with your top 10 pick.  I’d say it was worth it.

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
×
×
  • Create New...