Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person: Panthers really like Mason Graham and Jalon Walker


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Waldo said:

The guys at the top is what gets churned over and over again at draft time. They tried to make anyone going in the top of the draft stand out but the depth looked way better after their personal 'buts' were discussed. It was what, 2 guys and then basically guys you would see at the end of the 1st or 2nd in most other drafts?

The difference was the starting and top tier backup players were way, way more deep than a normal draft. It will be interesting to see how it turns out in a few years.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I wouldn't say overhyped at all. It was incredibly deep but light on elite talent. That was literally the story the whole cycle.

Well then it's a good thing we did get one of those elite talents in this draft, haha

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since this is bumped thought I'd share Jalon Walker's snaps since everyone thought we were gonnabe obvious and take him I was dreading it)

One game, preseason, yada yada I know. But this is EXACTLY why Ididn't want to touch him in the top 10. 

Second snap is a good rush but then be basically gets stonewalled as a rusher literally every snap after. His ability top stack and shed in the run game flashed on a snap or two but that wasn't a talent worth a top 10 pick. 

Edited by Rags
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Rags said:

Since this is bumped thought I'd share Jalon Walker's snaps since everyone thought we were gonnabe obvious and take him I was dreading it)

One game, preseason, yada yada I know. But this is EXACTLY why Ididn't want to touch him in the top 10. 

Second snap is a good rush but then be basically gets stonewalled as a rusher literally every snap after. His ability top stack and shed in the run game flashed on a snap or two but that wasn't a talent worth a top 10 pick. 

Yeah I’m so glad we didn’t take him. I feel like he could end up as a journeyman strong side linebacker as his ceiling. Not great but not terrible. Any pass rusher drafted in the top 10 better be a physical freak. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...