Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can Delhomme replace Lebron?


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

Good Lord, no :eek:

Delhomme is an ultra-nice guy, and he can make a pretty good ambassador for the Browns franchise if he succeeds.

Still, even in his prime he was never the "superstar" type, and that certainly isn't going to change now.

Wait...You weren't serious, were you? :skep:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just suddenly realized I'm going to be rooting for the Browns this year...whoa I bet a few of us on here will finally come to realize the true pain of rooting for a Cleveland team.

Wouldn't it be awsome is Delhomme suddenly throws like 40tds and like 7 ints and leads the Browns to the superbowl.

The only thing better would be if Moore leads us to the promised land...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just suddenly realized I'm going to be rooting for the Browns this year...whoa I bet a few of us on here will finally come to realize the true pain of rooting for a Cleveland team.

Wouldn't it be awsome is Delhomme suddenly throws like 40tds and like 7 ints and leads the Browns to the superbowl.

The only thing better would be if Moore leads us to the promised land...

I'll be watching every Cleveland game I can this season and rooting for them, and in turn Delhomme. I've got a friend who is a Browns fan, so it'll be fun to pay more attention to his team. He's also about the biggest Delhomme-hater on the face of the planet, so this should be interesting.

Oh, and you said "Browns to the Super Bowl." :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't it be awsome is Delhomme suddenly throws like 40tds and like 7 ints and leads the Browns to the superbowl.

The meltdown in this place would be hilarious. SMF would probably make 40 threads blaming Marty Hurney and John Fox for letting him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
    • Thielen's yards per reception was higher last year than any of Renfrows career.  His per game productivity last year as an old slow receiver the same as Renfrows 1 good season. These things are easy to find. 
    • With 1 more game but yeah hopefully Canales is better, obviously Rhule sucked. Better than Reich though and jury out on DC. Of course Wilks’ interim stint was the best we’ve had since 2017 but I give Tepper zero credit for that
×
×
  • Create New...