Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Myles Garrett, Browns Agree to Record Deal


Prowler2k18
 Share

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

"I demand to be traded to a contender! I want to win!"

"Wait... what was the number on that check again?? Gimme dat pen!!!"

 

Yea..he was full of sht... He almost got Watson money because he saw what Watson got. Hope he keeps motoring and not take the Watson route. 2 dudes taking up 100mil a year in cap...Browns will suck forever under Haslam...its not looking good for us either under ownership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Gapanthersfan said:

He’s a lock HOF’er and he’s worth every penny. 

Remember when we drafted the bookend to Garrett from A&M and he didn't pan out?  Yeah, people (me included) were like this dude's numbers (forget his name) are mid at best and Garrett is getting double teamed a lot.  Seems like his numbers should be better. 

*Cue Panthers scouting department*  This is our guy!!! ---> Flop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

"I demand to be traded to a contender! I want to win!"

"Wait... what was the number on that check again?? Gimme dat pen!!!"

 

 

58 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Typical negotiating tactics. 

 

56 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

A tale as old as time

 

51 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

If I had $100 every time a player said they want to go to a contender only to stay for a wad of cash,  I'd have more money than Myles Garrett.

 

All it took was a meeting with the owner and alllllll that BS about demanding and sitting out disappeared. I understand this is common I just hate the lies. Everyone does it too, such a fuging joke. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

 

 

 

All it took was a meeting with the owner and alllllll that BS about demanding and sitting out disappeared. I understand this is common I just hate the lies. Everyone does it too, such a fuging joke. 

It's not really a joke, it's posturing. Ask the Hurricanes how that feels with that cuck Rantanen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It's not really a joke, it's posturing. Ask the Hurricanes how that feels with that cuck Rantanen.

Dang, what happen? 

I have heard the fans have turned on the canes ownership after treating him like a god. I should keep up with the canes more, good for local economy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

Dang, what happen? 

I have heard the fans have turned on the canes ownership after treating him like a god. I should keep up with the canes more, good for local economy...

No, we didn't turn on the ownership, we turned on that bitch. fug him forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

No, we didn't turn on the ownership, we turned on that bitch. fug him forever.

 

Update me, I miss the whole reasons, just overheard fans talking in a restaurant. They seemed pissed too, but I don't know the real story. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Gapanthersfan said:

He’s a lock HOF’er and he’s worth every penny. 

Individually, sure. But man, unless the Browns can fall backassward into a good QB on a rookie contract they're cap fuged hard for the foreseeable future with damaged goods Watson and now this.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Individually, sure. But man, unless the Browns can fall backassward into a good QB on a rookie contract they're cap fuged hard for the foreseeable future with damaged goods Watson and now this.

 I bet he hasn't seen Watsons contract or the recent effect, its one huge whopper of a cap problem and they just passed it onto the next GM&HC. 

I keep telling myself "sure the Panthers are royal fugups, but at least they didn't trade for watson or wilson"

Even tepper after years of telling employees that Watson would be a panther, backed out once they demanded a fully guaranteed 1/3 of a billion. Thanks the gods!!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Individually, sure. But man, unless the Browns can fall backassward into a good QB on a rookie contract they're cap fuged hard for the foreseeable future with damaged goods Watson and now this.

Oh 100%. That team is 100% toast. Absolutely head scratching move since they could have traded him for some MAJOR draft capital. Imagine him in Buffalo or Washington. 

He himself is worth every penny they doled out for him, but it ends up hurting more than helping.

1. obvious cap implications

2. He is so dominant that they will win 2-3 more games each season than they would without him, robbing them of a top 5 draft pick. How strong is that. He is such a game wrecker that he alone virtually kills their shot at a top 5 pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gapanthersfan said:

Oh 100%. That team is 100% toast. Absolutely head scratching move since they could have traded him for some MAJOR draft capital. Imagine him in Buffalo or Washington. 

He himself is worth every penny they doled out for him, but it ends up hurting more than helping.

1. obvious cap implications

2. He is so dominant that they will win 2-3 more games each season than they would without him, robbing them of a top 5 draft pick. How strong is that. He is such a game wrecker that he alone virtually kills their shot at a top 5 pick. 

Yep. Given their situation they honestly should've traded him. They need to be trying to acquire talent on rookie contract while they work through this Watson contract anchor around their necks. They need draft capital on top of draft capital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...