Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rookie starters


smash_n_dash

Recommended Posts

By the end of the year, which rookies will have starting roles on the Carolina roster, not including ST positions?

My expectations is that Hardy and Lafell may be the only two rookies to have guaranteed starting spots because of their talent, not injuries to the starters in front of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tough call, as with everyone else, I agree that Lafell and Hardy will be on the field the most. But DE will be done by committee, so "starting" kinda loses it meaning. If you're splitting time 50-50 with someone, I don't think you should be considered the starter just because you were on the field for the first series.

I really don't see Brown, Brayton, or Johnson sitting on the bench in favor of Hardy. I see it being a four man rotation depending on the situation. And we all know Fox has a tendency to stick with the vets, so I bet more often than not, Brayton and Johnson will be out there for the first defensive series of the game.

Lafell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Them playing behind a couple more seasoned guys until they get familiar with coverage and pace of play is a good thing though. We really can use them to spell the other guys, and in situational ball especially with Ransom on possible run/blitzing downs.
    • They fuged him over so bad to help cover their bad judgement. About time he got a little something to wrk with. 
    • I think completion percentage is a bit of a overinflated stat for a qb too. People place to much stock into it. So many factors to consider with it : receivers, how many attempts are made deep, the defense etc all play a roll in it. When it’s considerably low 50% or less the QB accuracy can come into question. But I don’t think it’s necessarily one of the better percentages to put so much importance into for that position. General effectiveness is far more indicative of the QB you have. First downs, 3rd and 4th down conversions, points scored and clutch plays IMO is how you grade a QB. Always bothered the poo out of me how people downed Cam for his completion percentage and that’s what they used to disregard him as an all time great. Dude damn near averaged 3tds to 1 turnover a game and was an obvious difference maker for us.
×
×
  • Create New...