Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reading the Tea Leaves: What Did Morgan Just Tell Us?


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I'd rather have him than TMac.  I still would go Warren if going O. 

I think Golden's stock is improving and Dan had a smallish outside WR when he played -- maybe that is in his head.  Of course, this is all a talking point, who knows what they are doing, but it seems as if they have IGNORED WR so far--and that is strange.  Of course, we are not in the know.  Just a bunch of seagulls fighting for scraps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tr3ach said:

I'm not a TMac fan but I just don't see Golden being worth 8.  He makes some crazy catches but his tape is nowhere near his 40 time.  If we take receiver at 8 I would rather it be a tight end.  If we trade back then sure.

We could trade back, which would explain the secrecy.  If you trade back and a team knows for whom, they can leapfrog you

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be shocked if Golden makes it past the top 20. Thinking a team will roll the dice before that for sure it's an offensive league.

If we take him or Warren I'll be fine with it.

And as far as trading back goes it's such a risk to miss out on a really great talent just to get an extra pick. If we aren't being offered a haul nevermind that poo. Take the guy you believe in who is a top prospect and move along.

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Golden is small and fast.  Morgan's NFL career was spent watching a teammate (3rd rounder) rip defenses apart for a decade--and he was small and fast.  You never know how a type can influence your opinion of excellence.  Again, Golden is probably a value around #15-20, but his value in late April could be around #10. 

The real point here is how they seem--looking at the visits and free agency--to be ignoring a position that is a priority need.   Golden was my guess because I do not see any other WR in round 1 that might meet their specs. Gonna be fun.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

I'll be shocked if Golden makes it past the top 20. Thinking a team will roll the dice before that for sure it's an offensive league.

If we take him or Warren I'll be fine with it.

And as far as trading back goes it's such a risk to miss out on a really great talent just to get an extra pick. If we aren't being offered a haul nevermind that poo. Take the guy you believe in who is a top prospect and move along.

I think we could trade back but his stock has been rising.  It could be TE--they did talk to Mason Taylor--and I like him as well.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

everyone's reaction will be....

Snoop Dog Who GIF - Snoop Dog Who What - Discover & Share GIFs

as we trade up to draft a Carolina Gamecock at Saftey Emmanwori .  I have studied the Panthers and run all their prior actions through my newly designed PantherbotAI system.  Prepare.  No point replying about how we could trade back for him or don't need him.  The PantherbotAI has studied these people's past behavior. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

 

Only starting level gap left on D is the SS position. TM is a FS. 

 

Interesting.  Here is what I saw and never questioned:

image.thumb.png.f29b04e458572ec859ff5507948f736a.png

However, NFL Network calls him a free safety, and he has spent 3 years as the deep safety.  That makes me feel better about the signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

I think we could trade back but his stock has been rising.  It could be TE--they did talk to Mason Taylor--and I like him as well.

I'm open to options as far as who is the pick we have many needs. I'm just saying as far as trading back it needs to be a situation where we fully dictate the terms and honestly a team is desperate. If it's just us saying "hey let's trade down because we need more assets" that's not a good recipe IMO and that opens the door to us later having regret. Bypass that possibility unless we are fully taking advantage of some other franchise and even then if they are that desperate who are they targeting and should we just take that player instead? I've lived through Scott Fitterer who thought he had the biggest brain in the building every draft. Just no more of that please.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...