Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Packers score 59 points...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

The packers scored 59 points last night and it would take two good games just to match that in 4 of our preseason games (we are at 15 thru 2).

I know we've never been a high scoring team and preseason doesn't mean anything but how much pressure do you think the offense is under to put up some points on sat? Remember, we have yet to score an offensive touchdown. Is it a big deal if we don't or is it that age old excuse of preseason unimportance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the offense is on a little pressure to score some points this game. This will be the last game that the starters play in and while I'm sure that the team doesn't care about wins or losses in the preseason I think it is concerning that we can't score a single offensive touchdown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have an answer to our scoring woes, but I'm pretty sure right now I'd trade our 1st string special teams unit for the guys GB had in with 5 minutes left of the 4th quarter. Knee-jerk reaction, yes. But damn our special teams look ugly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the game and it wasnt the Colts defense was that bad but rather Rogers and company were great.His accuracy was excellant and the WRs and TEs run great routes and got great seperation.They made our offense look like a midget league team.:mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...