Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our Offense - The question of the Pre-Season


hepcat

Recommended Posts

I know it's only preseason, but so far the offense has been cause to worry. I think we could all agree that outside of DeAngelo Williams, there have been few bright spots.

My question - Is the lack of offense this preseason:

-A product of preseason game planning (holding the real plans back for the regular season)

-Playing to keep everybody healthy (players not taking many risks - even though Matt Moore has gotten hammered a few times)

-Playing two of the top defenses in the league (NYJ were #1 and Baltimore was the #3 defense last year)

-Missing key starters (Stewart, Smith, Otah)

-Succumbing to the youth movement?

I just remember the throttling the '08 Panthers gave the Redskins that preseason and knew that they had some things clicking on offense. But this year and last, the preseason has been pitiful. You can't judge a season based on a few preseason games and there is still time to pick up some steam. I'm just hoping for a TD out of the starters this Saturday...just to show that there is some life!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only issue I have with "we're not really game planning" is that either is the other team. So great, we'll finally start "bringing it" come the Giants. Well...so will they. What if the Jets had game planned more? Heck, the Ravens put points on the board against us without a game plan. I think that speaks volumes, that we can barely even take the ball down the field. Tomorrow will answer a lot, though. I look forward to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between not game planning on defense and not game planning on offense. On offense they are evaluating a certain play, route running, blocking, timing, so on and so forth. A huge part of the evaluation for a defense, however, is calls on the line by the mike and making adjustments to the offense. While they may not be calling specific formation based on game planning, the defense is definitely making adjustments to the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox has said there will be some game planning this game but having said that

I want to see some chemistry between the qb and receivers.Lets see if the OL can protect the qb.I am sure they will be game planning our running game so it will be interesting what that does for our passing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we kicked Washington's ass, that was the 3rd preseason game. So maybe on this 3rd preseason game we will do the same to Tennessee.... maybe.

Washington had a horrible run defense that year. Our team was hot all preseason up to that point. 08 is a good example of what preseason means, you come out strong and start winning games week 1, not mid season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox has said there will be some game planning this game but having said that

I want to see some chemistry between the qb and receivers.Lets see if the OL can protect the qb.I am sure they will be game planning our running game so it will be interesting what that does for our passing game.

If we want to see more chemistry between the quarterback and receivers, we have to put the receivers in for more than a few plays at a time. So far we have shuttled guys in and out just about every series. Plus we need to throw the ball more not less if we want to see some rhythm. Running 2 plays and throwing on third down doesn't build chemistry. Now if you want sustained drives, running may be the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Playing two of the top defenses in the league (NYJ were #1 and Baltimore was the #3 defense last year)

I think the coaches are still more focused on learning what we can do in different situations than in moving the ball.

This is what I want to believe. :patriot:

Since the third game is the game closest to a real game, I hope we come out have have a lights out offence....

Ten 3

Car 22

oh come on, 22 points is lights out for us. :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
    • Cooter was a good dude for sure. 
    • We both been here about the same amount of time. Whatever happened to Livermush? I know Cooter passed aways years ago...and so many others?
×
×
  • Create New...