Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An unbiased look at Clausen


jpo287

Recommended Posts

Just found this over at profootballfocus.com.

The rookie lumps keep coming for Jimmy Clausen (+0.1). His awareness of the play clock indicates he’s not quite up to the speed of how the NFL works, and his accuracy was questionable at best. His line did a great job giving him time (or the Saints’ pass rush did a poor job, depending on perspective), but he followed this up by completing 9 of 17 passes when not faced with pressure and getting overly happy feet on a further two dropbacks. Perhaps the best thing is he didn’t throw a pick and he’s not making the mistakes Matt Moore did, but he’s a long way from looking NFL-ready.

There's more stuff there but some of it contradicts what most people on this board think so a lot of you won't want to waste your time.

http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2010/10/04/re-focused-week-4-carolina-at-new-orleans/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So some random guy writes this on his blog and you've decided it's an "unbiased" professional assessment of Clausen's performance because it says what you want to hear.

How about we all take a deep breath and let this Clausen thing play out... we're not going to the playoffs this year, so what do we have to lose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually pro-foootballfocus is a pretty good site. They actually look at every play and evaluate it numerically. They have a premium site portion of the website (you have to pay for it) that gives you a breakdown of every player based on how they perform evey game.

Here is an exerpt from their about section:

Grading

1) Why do we grade?

The goal of our detailed grading process is to gauge how players execute their roles over the course of a game by looking at the performance of each individual on each play. We look beyond the stat sheet at game footage to try to gain an understanding of how well a lineman is blocking on a given play, how much space and help a runner is being given on a play, how effectively a pass rusher brings pressure or how well a defender covers a receiver.

We collect lots of extra statistics such as yards after catch, yards after contact, missed tackles, dropped passes etc., but our real focus is on grading individual performance on each play. Did an offensive lineman seal his block to spring the runner through a hole? Did a defensive lineman beat his block to force a runner to change the play direction in the backfield? Was the crucial third-down completion due to the quarterback beating the coverage or a breakdown in coverage?

We examine not just the statistical result of a play, but the context of that statistic. The defensive tackle may have made a tackle on a play, but if it was third and 5 and he got blown 4 yards off of the ball to make the tackle after a 6-yard gain, that’s not a good play.

This allows us to present a unique set of statistics for individual player performance in each game. We present base statistics alongside more advanced statistics together with a grade for every player. The marks are presented as overall composite grades but are also broken down in a number of key areas:

Offense

- Running

- Passing and receiving

- Pass protection

- Run blocking

- Screen blocking

Defense

- Run defense

- Pass rushing

- Pass coverag

As for Clausen, they are simply saying what many folks outside of Carolina and the homers are saying, we are a pretty bad team and Clausen is a rookie making lots of mistakes who many question whether he is NFL ready.

As for the O-line

All he said was that Sxhwartz looked pretty good. When Otah comes back I expect that Schwartz will slide to guard and Bernadeau will be the backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you remember college football changed their play clock sytem a few years ago to the same as the NFL, so Jimmy is use to the clock system. I Still think our OC is calling them into slow to Moore, who in turn relays them to Jimmy. I don't see why he is even calling plays in when it looks like we have just four plays. He should just let Jimmy mix them up like he wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

while this is no excuse, i read they could not hear anything in the helmets and had to relay plays in by hand from Moore. probably the loudest place he's ever played in, so its to be expected it takes some getting used to. lets see if he improves again this week. he's still better than Moore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All can be coached. These are all rookie mistakes. Not decision making mistakes which are more important than anything. His accuracy can be worked with, but everything else (timing of the game, time on clock) are rookie mistakes. He isn't making the plays that gives you reason to believe he can't do it, like Moore throwing INTs and breaking all the rules as a QB while doing them. I just think people are optimistic, how many games has it been since our qb did not throw 1 int? Right now all I watch by Clausen is the decision making.

How can everyone support Matt when he became our QB over Jake but when he stinks it up, the FO made a good choice not feeling the need to go through another 09 season and now Clausen appears to be making better decisions to not lose the game\. It was smart to get a look at Clausen this year. All panther fans should cheer Clausen on just like Moore is doing on the sidelines, the sooner the panthers find an adequate Qb the sooner they can build and will rebuild faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you remember college football changed their play clock sytem a few years ago to the same as the NFL, so Jimmy is use to the clock system. I Still think our OC is calling them into slow to Moore, who in turn relays them to Jimmy. I don't see why he is even calling plays in when it looks like we have just four plays. He should just let Jimmy mix them up like he wants.

did the clock management issues happen when he had communication problems?

how is that his fault?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All can be coached. These are all rookie mistakes. Not decision making mistakes which are more important than anything. His accuracy can be worked with, but everything else (timing of the game, time on clock) are rookie mistakes. He isn't making the plays that gives you reason to believe he can't do it, like Moore throwing INTs and breaking all the rules as a QB while doing them. I just think people are optimistic, how many games has it been since our qb did not throw 1 int? Right now all I watch by Clausen is the decision making.

How can everyone support Matt when he became our QB over Jake but when he stinks it up, the FO made a good choice not feeling the need to go through another 09 season and now Clausen appears to be making better decisions to not lose the game\. It was smart to get a look at Clausen this year. All panther fans should cheer Clausen on just like Moore is doing on the sidelines, the sooner the panthers find an adequate Qb the sooner they can build and will rebuild faster.

b/c until Clausen gets comfortable to really start looking downfield and trying to make plays.....we won't know if he is better than Moore. Jimmy is trying to play safe and Jimmy is trying to understand the NFL QB position.......

the so called Moore fanboys support Jimmy. The Jimmy fanboys are simply claiming Jimmy is a few steps ahead of where he is....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...