Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ultimate trade down mock


mccjeff
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is from cat scratchreader.com

https://www.derp/2025/3/31/24395163/ultimate-trade-down-mock-draft

Essentially they take every trade down offer for the whole draft. Only selected players when no trade offers were forthcoming. Outcome is as follows.

60 Harold Fannin TE Bowling Green

74 Andrew Mukuba S Texas

87 Isaiah Bond WR Texas

102 Jalen Royals WR Utah State

109 Anthony Belton OT NC State

111 Joshua Farmer DT Florida State

114 Billy Bowman S Oklahoma

119 Ozzy Trapillo OT Boston College

131 Danny Stutsman LB Oklahoma 

134 Demetrius Knight Jr LB South Carolina

153 Fadil Diggs Edge Syracuse

158 Jamaree Caldwell DT Oregon

163 Jonah Monheim OC USC

165 Brashard Smith RB SMU

168 Tyler Shough QB Louisville

169 Elijah Roberts DT SMU

170 Sebastian Castro S Iowa

177 Jake Majors OC Texas

179 Jah Joyner Edge Minnesota

181 Que Robinson Edge Alabama

182 Mitchell Evans TE Notre Dame

185 Simeon Barrow DT Miami (FL)

192 Ricky White WR UNLV

199 Jaydon Blue RB Texas

200 Upton Stout CB Western Kentucky

2026 2nd Round - CHI, HOU, NO

2026 3rd Round - CIN, DET, DET, HOU, PIT, SEA

TLDR: To long to explain without reading

 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PNW_PantherMan said:

Infusing the bottom of the roster with new talent.  Welcome to the hunger games.

My question would be, why collect all those picks to waste a vast majority of them on players you never intend to keep? You are basically collecting players to later cut for other teams to sign without spending a draft pick on them. I fail to see the logic.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

My question would be, why collect all those picks to waste a vast majority of them on players you never intend to keep? You are basically collecting players to later cut for other teams to sign without spending a draft pick on them. I fail to see the logic.

Load up early and roll the rest over to the next year and beyond while getting better value on those picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

My question would be, why collect all those picks to waste a vast majority of them on players you never intend to keep? You are basically collecting players to later cut for other teams to sign without spending a draft pick on them. I fail to see the logic.

It sucks.  First pick is a TE at 60 lol.  I'm just having fun with it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...