Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question: Donovan McNabb as a Panther in 2011?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Seeing how things have gone this year and knowing that we'll still be rebuilding next year. Just as Foxy did when he came in, new coaches, especially with an unproven group of QBs and young players, bring in a veteran guy they can trust as they're developing their system and cultivating personnel to fit it, to provide some stability. They usually use this guy to keep things moving as they look towards the future...

For instance, they play this guy if there isn't a viable option for a franchise QB on the roster already (until they find one), or if there is a viable option for the future, they play the vet until he's ready. Rodney Peete was that stabilizing guy, came in and put up some decent numbers and won over a lot of fans for his grit and surprisingly decent play. We didn't have an answer on the roster when we brought him in - I can say that because most of the Weinke-ites are gone now lol. They played Peete and brought Jake in his second season... Jake didn't practice well, so Peete continued as the starter until Fox took a gamble in put him in to win the Jags game, the rest is history... According to what we were looking for, Jake became that QB for the future that day and lasted for about 6 years.

It's reported Donovan McNabb will not re-sign with the Skins after this season.

Donovan McNabb-QB- Redskins Nov. 1 - 2:09 pm et

Michael Wilbon of the Washington Post predicts that Donovan McNabb will not re-sign with the Redskins this offseason.

(http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=nfl&id=704]

I thought we should've went after him this offseason, but we didn't, for obvious reasons. If there isn't a lockout, McNabb is 33 right now, and would be the perfect transition guy. I think McNabb is the type of QB that could play well until he's about 38 or so. I also think after what's happened the last two seasons with him, that his value is at an all-time low, so he should come fairly cheap. If Clausen is the guy, it will give us time to find out with the next coach. If not, the next coach will come in with a proven - winning- vet, and can draft his own guy with a what looks to be a Top 3 pick.

It will definitely shore up the position. Quite honestly, I have always admired McNabb and been a fan, so I would love the move and think it would help us through the difficult transition to a new system and possible further personnel overhaul that will come with a new staff. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the coach and scheme I guess... isn't he a WCO QB?

yeah he is, but like you said it depends on who we bring in after fox and co. is gone. I wouldn't mind having him here at all, he's definitely a better option than anything we have right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on how much he wants to pay for. Reliable backup QB type who will start at the position would get around 7 million or so. McNabb is probably still under the illusion that he deserves a top 5 QB salary.

Great idea but isn't going to work money wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...