Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Current 1st round draft postions


Cavscout

Recommended Posts

With 4 weeks to go in the regular season:

1 Carolina 1-11 :yesnod:

2 Detroit 2-10

3 Cincinnati 2-10

4 Buffalo 2-10

5 Arizona 3-9

6 Denver 3-9

7 San Francisco 4-8

8 Dallas 4-8

9 Tennessee 5-7

10 Washington 5-7

11 Houston 5-7

12 Minnesota 5-7

13 Cleveland 5-7

14 San Diego 6-6

15 New England (from Oakland) 6-6

16 Seattle 6-6

17 Indianapolis 6-6

18 Miami 6-6

19 Tampa Bay 7-5

20 Green Bay 8-4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we actually look to trade down look at how many teams picking high would move up for Luck

1 Carolina 1-11

2 Detroit 2-10 No

3 Cincinnati 2-10 YES

4 Buffalo 2-10 YES

5 Arizona 3-9 YES

6 Denver 3-9 New HC very possible

7 San Francisco 4-8 YES

8 Dallas 4-8 Eh maybe

9 Tennessee 5-7 With VY being a bitch YES

10 Washington 5-7 YES

11 Houston 5-7 No

12 Minnesota 5-7 YES

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I hear one more person talk about trading down I am going to send a virus to this entire forum so that such idiotic comments can no longer be made. If we get the #1 pick WE ARE NOT TRADING DOWN. There is no way in hell that we pass on Andrew Luck...get it through your dimwitted skulls that Jimmy Clausen BLOWS and we need a QB more than any other position.

QBs = MVPs THEY WIN GAMES...Not DTs, Not DEs, Not DBs, Not LBs, Not RBs...QBS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I hear one more person talk about trading down I am going to send a virus to this entire forum so that such idiotic comments can no longer be made. If we get the #1 pick WE ARE NOT TRADING DOWN. There is no way in hell that we pass on Andrew Luck...get it through your dimwitted skulls that Jimmy Clausen BLOWS and we need a QB more than any other position.

QBs = MVPs THEY WIN GAMES...Not DTs, Not DEs, Not DBs, Not LBs, Not RBs...QBS!

This guy disagrees.

a1807a42a1108d53504c2649062912d7.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I hear one more person talk about trading down I am going to send a virus to this entire forum so that such idiotic comments can no longer be made. If we get the #1 pick WE ARE NOT TRADING DOWN. There is no way in hell that we pass on Andrew Luck...get it through your dimwitted skulls that Jimmy Clausen BLOWS and we need a QB more than any other position.

QBs = MVPs THEY WIN GAMES...Not DTs, Not DEs, Not DBs, Not LBs, Not RBs...QBS!

Has anyone heard if Hurney has come out and said we are looking to trade down or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Pytor kochetkov assigned to Chicago for conditioning stint. Wonder if he gets playing time in the playoffs if Bussi or Freddy flounders 
    • What specific LT at 19 are all of the OT Stan’s wanting? Be specific. All have issues and are not guaranteed to improve the OL.. The chances of one of these LT’s who are projected at 19 (Proctor, Lomu) being a bust is much higher than a guy like Lemon/Concepcion imo. Do you really want to draft a kid who has weight struggles along with lateral movement issues? And the other who was a shitty run blocker vs Big 12 competition? Morgan and Co. want to see how Rasheed Walker plays.. They also want to see how Icky’s rehab goes.. There’s a lot of  “wait and see at OT”  We don’t have the luxury for our 1st round pick being a backup. We lack top end talent. Morgan and the others have made it known they want to win now. For that reason, I’m almost positive we punt on OT in the first this year and worry about it next year in the first round if need be.    Thieneman would be ideal. He’s a natural “center field” safety with great coverage skills. For the posters who want trade up for Downs…Do you realize he struggles in coverage? He’s more of a box safety. We already have two of those players.. I wouldn’t mind trading in front of the Vikings for the Thieneman though.. Next need would be DT, but I don’t see the value there at 19.. Same with edge. WR at #19 is very realistic. Who would improve this team more than Lemon/Concepcion? You could argue a slot CB, but the value isn’t great there either. People tend to forget the Seattle Seahawks game.. Yes BY sucked, but no one was getting open.. We could use a quick savvy route runner to beat man coverage. TMAC and Coker are great, but consistently creating separation vs Man Coverage is not their strength. 
    • Freddie owned this game. My 1st star.
×
×
  • Create New...