Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

He is declaring for the draft!!! Not Andrew luck, im an idiot and have a hairy back.


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

I posted this in another thread, but I'll repeat:

Gabbert is absolutely going to destroy the combine. He's got crazy arm strength, accuracy, and athletic ability. His glaring weaknesses are pocket awareness and dealing with pressure, and he won't have to deal with that during 7-on-7's. I expect him to sky rocket up draft boards during draft preparation (all of this assuming he comes out early).

If he wasn't such a pussy I'd take him before anyone not named Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope that any fan with sense knows that these threads are going to be coming for quite a while... which is why I sensed it as soon as I saw the thread title... so when you see these TYPES of threads for a while FA's, Coaches blah blah blah...just be calm and don't get your hopes up lol...seriously

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Various early draft predictions have rated Gabbert as a first-round pick and the second-best at his position behind Andrew Luck of Stanford.

Missouri totaled 18 victories the last two seasons and this year's 10-win season was only the fourth in school history. Gabbert passed for 3,186 yards and 16 touchdowns.

In 31 games at Missouri, Gabbert passed for 6,822 yards, fourth best in school history.

So this is actually relevant especially if Luck doesn't declare

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That zone was so soft that 3 guys were bearly on the screen. No rushing called. Playing off the line 10+ yards. Yeah that's garbage time. It took an onsides kick to make them try to play D again. Until then they didn't care and still wouldn't play real D against Young until they absolutely had to and that was with backups in the backfield. Slow start is freaking hilarious. He was gifted the lowest effort a bad team can give and still couldn't put anything together for 1 freaking series at the end after 2 quarters of warmup ball. It was like watching someone stretching for an hour and then pull a hammy after 10 feet of running. 
    • On the subject of Reich and him being no good as a coach, because he wouldn’t change everything he did to accommodate Young. He wanted to sit Young. He knew what Young was.  But to the point, was Andrew Luck a good QB under Reich in Indy? Most people don’t hesitate to say yes. Well, Luck thought enough of his coaching to bring him to Stanford.  There is a bona fide NFL QB that seems to dispute the painting of Reich as a incompetent and the reason for Young’s shortcomings.  Yes he got fired. It appears as if Tepper and Fitterer forced a QB he did not want on him and poisoned the well right from the start. I don’t blame Reich one bit for being pissed either.  And I wasn’t a Reich guy I wanted Wilks. I accepted the Reich hire but never lobbied for him.  Just saying he is being dogged here unfairly.   
    • I think its a mix of both. Bryce being too small and offense is too vanilla. Plays arent creative enough. Most are slants, fades and runs. But even Baker and Sam had to deal with vanilla offense and looked horrid. Thats why I say it's a mix of both.
×
×
  • Create New...