Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

$anders Drama just got More Interesting for Panthers


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

The only part of this that is surprising post Carr is anyone wanting Rogers with the totality of what he showed in NJ. Dude is nothing but a name and a bag of cancer he brings with him.

I'm glad Sanders is heating up. It increases the chances of a trade back and that's absolutely what I am still wishing for.

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

The only part of this that is surprising post Carr is anyone wanting Rogers with the totality of what he showed in NJ. Dude is nothing but a name and a bag of cancer he brings with him.

I'm glad Sanders is heating up. It increases the chances of a trade back and that's absolutely what I am still wishing for.

That is the point.  Every day, something new is happening that could impact our trade value.  The Sanders situation could impact what we do, and it gets crazier every day.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The hang up and repeating ad nauseum of the $$ thing didn't help your post.

 Enough with the personal criticisms. I don't care, frankly, and if I wanted writing advice from someone, I am pretty sure you would not be contacted.  What you seem to not understand is that early I stated that I would refer to Shedeur as $$--to avoid confusion with his dad and to shorten it.  It is common when you use an acronym, because the acronym represents something that is going to be repeated. 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Was your opinion solicited?  Enough with the personal criticisms. I don't care, frankly.

You posted an opinion to in your own words "start a thread" of discussion on a public forum, so yeah kinda.

I'm not criticizing your personally. I'm just saying that when you type in an obviously intentional inflammatory way you're pretty much derailing your own thread right from the jump. Why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You posted an opinion to in your own words "start a thread" of discussion on a public forum, so yeah kinda.

I'm not criticizing your personally. I'm just saying that when you type in an obviously intentional inflammatory way you're pretty much derailing your own thread right from the jump. Why?

  The opinion should be the focus, not the method of delivery.  I don't care what you think is obvious or that I repeated an acronym too much for you--don't care.  Do not know what you are trying to prove, only that what you are proving is far from it.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

  The opinion should be the focus, not the method of delivery.  I don't care what you think is obvious or that I repeated an acronym too much for you--don't care.  Do not know what you are trying to prove, only that what you are proving is far from it.

Im trying to prove that you're a poor and pugnacious communicator but you're doing a more effective job of that than me so thanks. LOL

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing, if somebody trades ahead of us to get Sanders,  there is a possibility  of a panic run. Dart or Milroe chatter could make someone show their hand since it'd put a spotlight on the Saints taking the next qb available. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think Sanders is good enough where teams are going to be willing to give up when it takes to get our spot but the Carr news only helps us. Best case scenario I think is the Saints swap with us because they think someone else is getting 8 and we get an extra 3 and take the same player we would have at 8. I’d love to pick up future 1sts but the Steelers and Rams are perennial playoff teams so most likely will be mid 20s next year. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...