Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Word of caution about drafting Fairley


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Since some on here read the headline, twist it into something they can attack, and never read the explanation in the content, this is not saying that we should not take Fairley or that he will not be a great NFL player. It is, however, an attempt to look beyond the hype and analyze his transition from college to the NFL.

Fairley is on everyone's radar because he is making plays. His hands are phenomenal, his first step Jenkins-like in its quickness. His speed and ability to rush the passer are unquestioned. He has a chip on his shoulder--very nice. Is he the complete DT? You cannot jump to that conclusion quite yet.

In many systems, a DT's job is to take on double teams and keep the OL off the LBs. Collapse the pocket, but do so without opening throwing or running lanes--stay in the QBs face. In other words, if he does his job correctly, others should make plays.

Fairley made a lot of plays and was constantly in the backfield. My concern/question is this: Does he have the ability to take on the double team? Is he purely a gap shooter and will not be able to maintain two-gap responsibilities? Against the spread offense he was often unblocked and read by the QB. Many plays were made by Fairley shooting through gaps vacated by pulling linemen. In other words, I saw little gap responsibility.

Damien Lewis was a high draft pick (mid first round) who had similar qualities.

He could simply be good, or he could be good because they turned him loose and allowed him to fly around with no gap responsibilites. He was not on anyone's radar last year, and this year he is a superstar. That reeks of system change or steroids (JOKE).

I would watch a lot of tape on him to see what he can do for us and our system before taking him #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope, what ur saying is kinda retarded. Yeah Fairly gets penetration, makes plays but he may not be able to occupy an OL. WTF. Any team that drafts him, is not drafting him to occupy an OL. They want him to penetrate, get in the back field and cause havoc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very well thought out post MHS and a breath of fresh air from all of the typical "anti-Fairley" conversation that usually ends up in pro-Green. Those are definitely concerns and the comparison to Lewis in that light is solid. In order to be that game-changing Sapp-like DT that is feared by opposing offensive coordinators, he will need to bring that to the table. I think his athleticism and passion for the game (what little I have seen of him this season) will hopefully translate over to the next level if he does lack these skills. At the NFL level, these are the best of the best on both sides of the ball, so being able to dominate an O-Line at the collegiate level is obviously not the same. I think his ability to penetrate and push back at the LOS will help him take on the double teams. He already has the hand and foot speed to change directions and I think if he knows his responsibilities, he will be okay. As long as he doesn't overcommit or try to blow up every play like it's a sportscenter highlight, then I'm okay with it. I hope he has the patience and desire to be the best once he enters the league. He has the tools and body to be a dominating player, and I think Rivera will light a fire under him and take him to where he needs to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope, what ur saying is kinda retarded. Yeah Fairly gets penetration, makes plays but he may not be able to occupy an OL. WTF. Any team that drafts him, is not drafting him to occupy an OL. They want him to penetrate, get in the back field and cause havoc.

Yes and No.

Players like Lewis got exploited as his burst and aggression in getting penetration just opened up the running lane behind him. He would often be taken out of plays by guards pulling from the other side and essentially using the aggression against them.

Suh did pretty darn well this year, but early int he season teams were constantly exploiting his 'eyes for the QB'. Teams were swinging OLine players from the other side allowing the OG or Ot opposite him to instantly get tot he second level. He would penetrate and get blind sided and allow the runningback to go straight into the secondary as the OG/OT is already swallowing up LBs.

I am not too concerned with his ability to defeat double teams, because if they are doubling him, that means our DEs are being single blocked. Plus he is unlikely to be drawing the double team, as that would usually be the NTs responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope, what ur saying is kinda retarded. Yeah Fairly gets penetration, makes plays but he may not be able to occupy an OL. WTF. Any team that drafts him, is not drafting him to occupy an OL. They want him to penetrate, get in the back field and cause havoc.

Some people have been saying he could play a one technique like Ratliff or a 5 technique like the pats do with wilfork sometimes but I'd rather him not have to keep his shoulders parallel and just get the fug in there and ruin poo.

They can find some fat ass to stick on the line besides him to eat up blockers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...