Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McDermott was in over his head in Philly

Wolfcop

By Wolfcop,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Wolfcop Grand Master

Wolfcop

Posted
Posted

according to Trotter. (sounds like sour grapes to me)

08:02 AM ET 01.19 | Even as he's moved on, Sean McDermott continues to make news in Philadelphia, where he was fired after the Eagles season. And one former player says he's not surprised. Jeremiah Trotter, who played 13 games (starting seven) in 2009 for McDermott, doesn't think McDermott was ready for the job. "I may be the only guy in the city that wasn't surprised," Trotter said. ... "The defense went backwards. It was worse in the red zone. And we had a better year last year on defense. So any time you see a young coach that in my opinion really wasn't quite ready to step into that defensive coordinator role just yet, and have two bad seasons, sometimes you just gotta cut your losses."

http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/261730?eref=twitter_feed

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Saltman Apprentice

The Saltman

Posted
Posted

this

Reid and their GM are passing the buck here. Add in that they traded their first round pick and both of their third round picks to move up 11 spots in the 2010 draft to take DE Graham (at a position of need) , a poor pick it appears, coupled with a defense that got used and abused at the end of the 2009 season and the DC never had a chance.

That defense Suucked it 2009 when it mattered. See those games against the Cowboys one more time. It goes way deeper than just a DC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

i think he's partly right. i was actually thinking that for a while in '09 after their amazing start that season started to peter out. i think he lacked maturity, although he is very likely incredibly intelligent and well taught by johnson. he might have been too aggressive and wasn't able to look at the big picture. having him work with rivera as his boss will help him a lot more in his development as a DC, imo. i just don't think he was ready for the job.

of course philly didn't do him any favors. they were totally focused on the offense on that team and were trying to load up on receivers and build the passing game and skimped on defense. it was kind of the opposite of foxball where defense and the run game was the focus and the passing game was neglected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HSCBandit07 Newbie

HSCBandit07

Posted
Posted

I think this is a good situation for McDermott. Rivera has already said he'll be involved in teh defense. This is a perfect way for McDermott to gain more experience learning from one of the top defensive coordinators in the NFL.

:yesnod:

Andy Reid is an Offensive coach. It seems McDermott was mishandled. He will be just fine here as long as the players take to him and there is no confusion in chain of command with Meeks, McDermott, and Rivera coaching the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Actionman0z Veteran

Actionman0z

Posted
Posted

Bottom line for this thread is that hes going to have help from Rivera with every aspect of game planning, so that on game day, he can look at his down and distance chart, and call one of several plays. It wont all be on him and assistance, he'll have help from the Head Honcho is about as good a DC as we could have hired. IM not worried about it. They know eachother they are going to be prepared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wolfcop Grand Master

Wolfcop

Posted
  • Author
Posted

McDermott is in a good situation with Rivera just like he was with Jim Johnson. He's not in there calling all the plays...Rivera will be doing that (ala Rex Ryan at NYJ). It'll be a good combination.

This, exactly. They will be all be able to put their heads together but RR will be the boss and make the final decisions on strategy and play calls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blackcatgrowl Newbie

blackcatgrowl

Posted
Posted

McDermott is in a good situation with Rivera just like he was with Jim Johnson. He's not in there calling all the plays...Rivera will be doing that (ala Rex Ryan at NYJ). It'll be a good combination.

I'm seeing the future...

Scene: The Panthers are down by 3, with 3:12 left in the 4th Quarter. They need a defensive stop to give the new offense a chance at scoring a TD and beating the Falcons and claim an early lead in the division ranks.

The Falcons send out a 3 WR set after running for 1 yard on 1st down. The Panther's D is switching out personnel for Pass Coverage when Coach Rivera and McDermott have a quick discussion on what play to call.

McDermott: Sir, they are trying a pass play I believe.

Rivera: Ok, line up for short pass play coverage, but have our Strong Safety blitz the QB and take em down. Patada en el culo!!!

McDermott: Yes sir, I'll call that in right away sir. Sir? Did you want your hot chocolate brought down now sir?

Rivera: Yes, that would be fine.

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Newbie

House

Posted
Posted

Personally, I believe what happened to McDermott in Philly was this:

Philly was a team that had a pretty good run with a great D. They had been living off the reputation of that D for the last few years. With a combination of bad draft picks, aging veterans, and overpaid FA that never really lived up to the hype their D has fallen into disrepair. I don't know that anyone could have done a whole lot better with what they have up there. People still tend to think of it as "the Eagles D!" when honestly the last few seasons it has been "the Eagles D?". Mostly because of lack of real talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      The Hurricanes are never getting over the hump untill they spend money in the net

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I agree. Two holes FTW!
    • csx
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By csx · Posted

      Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • kungfoodude
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control. Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst rosters in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most volatile franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete disaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
×
×
  • Create New...