Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayock top 5 positional rankings

Murph

By Murph,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

GoHeels74 Newbie

GoHeels74

Posted
Posted

If we stay at #1 I think we have to take Nick Fairley since we are so bad at DT. I wouldn't mind seeing us trade down 5-6 picks and get a 2nd round pick. That way we could get my guys Robert Quinn and Marvin Austin as our first two picks but that's just my UNC homer fantasy lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted

I'm going to reserve my judgment for after the combine and pro days. If Gabbert shows that he is an elite talent, that his footwork is good, that he is a capable leader then I think you have to make him the pick. If you think you can get him later then you can also trade down. I'm fine with either scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

If we stay at #1 I think we have to take Nick Fairley since we are so bad at DT. I wouldn't mind seeing us trade down 5-6 picks and get a 2nd round pick. That way we could get my guys Robert Quinn and Marvin Austin as our first two picks but that's just my UNC homer fantasy lol.

from a fellow tar heel to another.....no

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthro Community Regular

Panthro

Posted
Posted

If we stay at #1 I think we have to take Nick Fairley since we are so bad at DT. I wouldn't mind seeing us trade down 5-6 picks and get a 2nd round pick. That way we could get my guys kentwan balmer and Ryan Sims as our first two picks but that's just my UNC homer fantasy lol.

fixed for accuracy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

I'm going to reserve my judgment for after the combine and pro days. If Gabbert shows that he is an elite talent, that his footwork is good, that he is a capable leader then I think you have to make him the pick. If you think you can get him later then you can also trade down. I'm fine with either scenario.
none of this would show where he is weakest, which is under pressure.

people put far too much stock in the combine. it doesn't show what players do in real conditions, only under the most ideal, with no one coming at you.

i don't care how well he does at the combine. he should not be our selection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
TANTRIC-NINJA Community Regular

TANTRIC-NINJA

Posted
Posted

If we stay at #1 I think we have to take Nick Fairley since we are so bad at DT. I wouldn't mind seeing us trade down 5-6 picks and get a 2nd round pick. That way we could get my guys Robert Quinn and Marvin Austin as our first two picks but that's just my UNC homer fantasy lol.

We should learn from the Bobcats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doc LRB
      Breakout 2025 Candidates

      By Doc LRB · Posted

      https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
×
×
  • Create New...