Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Panthers go after Plaxico Burress??


Pantherman

Recommended Posts

As most of us know Plaxico spent 2 years in Jail for pretty much shotting himself in the leg with his own gun in public. But besides that Burress has not been in to much off the field trouble and he was playing good ball with the Giants before going to Jail. According to his Agent Twitter he is Strong and ready to come back to play NFL football. Been out for 2 years and not NFL ready and Age factor. Should the panthers take a stab at him in the Summer to get Vet leadership and get some help for smith?? I feel he would be good for a slot receiver postion to help out some and help the young WR out and learn how to run routes better. Your thoughts!! I know it a long shot. But wouldn't hurt. Look at Vick. After 2 years back in the NFL he is starting QB and is playing once again and he did much worse stuff then Burress did. :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People you've got to love the gun law's in NY, they put the man that caught the winning TD in the superbowl in prison for 2 year's for shooting himself in the leg. All that could have been avoided by wearing a good holster. Or did they lock him up just cause he had a gun, who know's. Anyway, no, don't need Plax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
×
×
  • Create New...