Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prospects of interest going into day three


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Top teams can afford to do that cause they don't have holes like we do.  Also Eagles traded up to get Mukuba, was he BPA?

We seem to have a philosophical difference. Of course every team has a board based on their needs. What we must be cognizant of is that not all prospect are on the board of every team. That being said, presumably a board is full of players that can fill a team's own needs, or "holes" if you will. That being said, you should stick to the board. In no way should you pick a lower ranked player over a higher ranked player. Good teams don't do that. You can't necessarily fill every hole via the draft. And, to be honest, if you're forcing yourself to fill a hole, you're probably going to end up with more holes after the dust settles. 

Fill holes the best that you can in free agency, and then use the draft to choose the best players. Having patience and discipline is generally a good philosophy when it comes to building something. Team building is no different.

Edited by TD alt
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Icege said:

Panthers remaining picks

  • Round 4, Pick 12 (#114)
  • Round 4, Pick 20 (#122)
  • Round 5, Pick 2 (#140)
  • Round 5, Pick 27 (#163)
  • Round 6, Pick 32 (#208)

 

Safeties

  • Billy Bowman Jr (Oklahoma)
  • Lathan Ransom (Ohio State)
  • RJ Mickens (Clemson)
  • Sebastian Castro (Iowa)
  • Malachi Moore (Alabama)
  • Maxen Hook (Toledo)

 

Cornerbacks

  • Dorian Strong (Virginia Tech)
  • Denzel Burke (Ohio State)
  • Zy Alexander (LSU)
  • Quincy Riley (Louisville)
  • Cobee Bryant (Kansas)
  • O'Donnell Fortune (South Carolina)
  • Jabbar Muhammad (Oregon)

 

Defensive Tackles

  • Cam Jackson (Florida)
  • Joshua Farmer (Florida State)
  • JJ Pegues (Ole Miss)
  • Deone Walker (Kentucky)
  • Aeneas Peebles (Virginia Tech)
  • Warren Brinson (Georgia)
  • Nazir Stackhouse (Georgia)
  • Tyrion Ingram-Dawkin (Georgia)
  • Ty Hamilton (Ohio State)
  • Ty Robinson (Nebraska)
  • CJ West (Indiana)
  • Tim Smith (Alabama)
  • Tonka Hemingway (South Carolina)
  • Yahya Black (Iowa)
  • Jordan Phillips (Maryland)
  • Howard Cross III (Notre Dame)

 

Offensive Tackles

  • Cameron Williams (Texas)
  • Chase Lundt (UConn)
  • Logan Brown (Kansas)
  • Jack Nelson (Wisconsin)
  • Ajani Cornelius (Oregon)

 

Tight Ends

  • Gunnar Helm (Texas)
  • Mitchell Evans (Notre Dame)
  • Jake Briningstool (Clemson)
  • Luke Lachey (Iowa)
  • Jalin Conyers (Texas A&M)
  • Ben Yuroseck (Georgia)

 

Running Backs

  • Dylan Sampson (Tennessee)
  • Bhayshul Tuten (Virginia Tech)
  • Cam Skattebo (Arizona State)
  • Trevor Etienne (Georgia)
  • Woody Marks (USC)
  • Jarquez Hunter (Auburn)
  • Jaydon Blue (Texas)
  • LeQuint Allen (Syracuse)
  • Brashard Smith (SMU)
  • Raheim Sanders (South Carolina)
  • Ollie Gordon II (Oklahoma State)
  • Devin Neal (Kansas)
  • DJ Giddens (Kansas State)
  • Tahj Brooks (Texas Tech)
  • Kalel Mullings (Michigan)
  • Donovan Edwards (Michigan)
  • Kyle Monangai (Rutgers)
  • Ulysses Bentley IV (Mississippi)

Jaylin Lane.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TD alt said:

The league says otherwise

Matt Leblanc Whatever GIF

Yeah, teams contort logic to make a need magically become the best player available.  We are the perfect example.  Find me a hand full of Big Boards where T-Mac was the 8th best prospect.  News flash, he wasn't.  Walker was rated higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...