Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Game 5 8pm

Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

Alemanders Experienced

Alemanders

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, DamnItJake! said:

What does that ever mean!!?? Dog walked!! Are u from Florida?

Dog walked" in a slang context means to outsmart, overpower, or completely dominate someone, as if you are in full control of them, much like walking a dog on a leash. This expression implies taking control of an argument or situation, often in a way that feels dismissive or condescending. 
 
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
  • The phrase suggests having a clear advantage in a conversation, argument, or interaction, leading to a situation where the other person is easily controlled or outsmarted. 
     
  • The comparison to walking a dog emphasizes the idea of being in control and directing another's actions, much like a dog on a leash follows its owner. 
     
  • The term can also imply a sense of overwhelming someone with facts, logic, or superior knowledge, making them appear helpless or unable to respond effectively. 
     
  • The idiom can carry a dismissive or condescending connotation, suggesting that the person being "dog walked" is not worthy of a serious response. 
     
  • "Dog walk" is used metaphorically to describe someone dominating or controlling another person. 
     
 
 
Lol, Im from nc 
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherChris Grand Master

PantherChris

Posted
Posted
Just now, TLGPanthersFan said:

Yeah, team is rattled. The energy they were playing with is gone.

Because they are a bunch of fugging morons who let in 2 in 30 fugging seconds this team deserves to fugging lose. Same bullsh*t they did last year only a game earlier 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PleaseCutStewart Grand Master

PleaseCutStewart

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, DamnItJake! said:

Just stay focused!! Don’t get rattled!!

Unfortunately this team has the mental fortitude of a 7 year old. They start losing their focus when they blow a lead and start chasing the puck and then give up another three goals before you know it

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DamnItJake! Grand Master

DamnItJake!

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Alemanders said:
Dog walked" in a slang context means to outsmart, overpower, or completely dominate someone, as if you are in full control of them, much like walking a dog on a leash. This expression implies taking control of an argument or situation, often in a way that feels dismissive or condescending. 
 
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
  • The phrase suggests having a clear advantage in a conversation, argument, or interaction, leading to a situation where the other person is easily controlled or outsmarted. 
     
  • The comparison to walking a dog emphasizes the idea of being in control and directing another's actions, much like a dog on a leash follows its owner. 
     
  • The term can also imply a sense of overwhelming someone with facts, logic, or superior knowledge, making them appear helpless or unable to respond effectively. 
     
  • The idiom can carry a dismissive or condescending connotation, suggesting that the person being "dog walked" is not worthy of a serious response. 
     
  • "Dog walk" is used metaphorically to describe someone dominating or controlling another person. 
     
 
 
Lol, Im from nc 

Got it but it’s a dumb term!! Thanks for the info 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherChris Grand Master

PantherChris

Posted
Posted
Just now, PleaseCutStewart said:

Unfortunately this team has the mental fortitude of a 7 year old. They start losing their focus when they blow a lead and start chasing the puck and then give up another three goals before you know it

Besides the point SLOPPY BS GIVING UP 2 IN 30S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Proudiddy
      Jabrill Peppers Available

      By Proudiddy · Posted

      I’m not mad at Moehrig.  He’s great at what he does.  And to be honest, a lot of my favorite safeties in our history were box-first type guys - Maxie, Minter, Mike Mitchell, Chris Harris…  they’re first and foremost objective was to put people on their backs and coverage was secondary.  There is a place for that.  There is a definite need for that.  Physical guys that set the tone.  So cool, we have that in Moerhig. But what we have lacked for the vast majority of our existence is a true free safety that cleans everything up on the back end.  Sometimes they come in the form of a JOAT, like Peppers.  I think he would be a fantastic compliment to Moehrig’s strengths and weaknesses.  If we don’t go after him, I certainly hope Ransom is given the chance to grow and develop in real-time with real game reps, because what he did in preseason was very encouraging to see.  I hope he can grow into that roaming center fielder with a little bit of an edge to him as an enforcer as well.  He has the tools.  In the meantime, adding Peppers would only help.
    • Navy_football
      Everything revolves around Bryce This Year

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Option 1 is most likely. Even if he kills it this year, it wouldn't be prudent to rush an extension for one good season. If you have to pay him more because you waited another year, then he earned it. And that's OK. Adjust accordingly. 
    • Navy_football
      197

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Cam had the advantage of having a very strong supporting cast his first 2 seasons. Things definitely worsened later on. But those first couple of years can kill a QB. Some never truly recover. If they do recover it takes years, and usually with another team. Trying to learn to be an NFL QB with TEs and WRs that are trying to learn too is a recipe for disaster. Imagine if Cam's rookie season was that 2014 offensive squad. Changes everything! I said it when they moved up in 2023. This team wasn't ready for a rookie QB yet. Anyone that thinks Stroud would have been a lot better is delusional. The correct formula is to build a strong team and then you go get your rookie QB. Not the other way around. BY is going into his third season and we're still trying to put a respectable group of WRs and TEs around him. I think they have the right personnel now. Unfortunately they haven't developed into actual NFL players yet.  This season we should expect consistency and aggressiveness from BY. Mostly for his development but also to DEVELOP his young cast.
×
×
  • Create New...