Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guys that will either make or break our Young Quarterback!!


Doc LRB
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, jfra78 said:

I didnt read the article, but there are no excuses for Bryce.  He will make or break his self, stop blaming the rest of the team for his "short" comings.  Had to do it

 

Excited Lets Go GIF by BoDoggos

I wish it was different, but really, it's all in his own hands now. If he can come back and be that guy he was at the end of last season then we are looking at something long-term and grand.

If not... then it is back to the draft, again. Unless Canales has another reclamation project waiting in the wings.

Personally, I believe in what I saw. I think he can certainly do it. I want to see him succeed at the highest level possible.

Edited by Khyber53
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On paper and previous performance, this line is very strong.  Not perfect but it shouldn't be a concern for a QB.  There is a stronger case for concern related to his weapons than his protection but this offense is built for a QB to be successful and it is up to Bryce at this point.  

Cautiously optimistic based on the end of last season but time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, XClown1986 said:

Maybe the offense doesn't have any excuses, but the defense has to give the team a chance. We can't be playing from 3 touchdowns behind and expect the offense to still thrive every game. We have to get some stops on 3rd down. We have to be able to create more time of possession for the offense more opportunities through turnovers. There's more pressure on Evero than there is on Bryce I think this year. Even if only slightly.

We had the 29th ranked O last year.   29th ranked offenses need defenses to flat out win games for them.   

and virtually ALL the investment went into that O while virtually intentionally letting the D slide.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

We had the 29th ranked O last year.   29th ranked offenses need defenses to flat out win games for them.   

and virtually ALL the investment went into that O while virtually intentionally letting the D slide.  

Plus he can still have a great season with a bad defense.  It may not show up as wins but he should get plenty of drives to show how far along he has come in his development even with a bad defense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Plus he can still have a great season with a bad defense.  It may not show up as wins but he should get plenty of drives to show how far along he has come in his development even with a bad defense.  

Really bad defenses actually present opportunity for offenses to overperform statistically.  

which IMO is a red flag/concern about last year.  We had a historically bad defense.....and really didn't generate much O

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

We had the 29th ranked O last year.   29th ranked offenses need defenses to flat out win games for them.   

and virtually ALL the investment went into that O while virtually intentionally letting the D slide.  

Yeah and the defense was the worst in history, statistically. And then we invested heavily into defense this off-season. We had holes everywhere last year and weren't a good team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

Yeah and the defense was the worst in history, statistically. And then we invested heavily into defense this off-season. We had holes everywhere last year and weren't a good team. 

I still contend if you give any org our OL last year......more offense should of resulted.   The D being THAT bad makes sense given what the DL was post Brown going down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I still contend if you give any org our OL last year......more offense should of resulted.   The D being THAT bad makes sense given what the DL was post Brown going down. 

One player going down on either side of the ball (minus quarterback) should never reasonably result in complete collapse.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

One player going down on either side of the ball (minus quarterback) should never reasonably result in complete collapse.

I mean, it wasn't a "collapse" as much as it just made an already bad defense historically bad. Add any one player in NFL history to that D and it would've still sucked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

We had the 29th ranked O last year.   29th ranked offenses need defenses to flat out win games for them.   

and virtually ALL the investment went into that O while virtually intentionally letting the D slide.  

It has been really weird to watch this team go from Sam Mills to Thomas Davis to Dan Morgan to Jon Beason to Luke Kuchly to.... being content with Josey Jewell. Linebackers used to be our DNA and now are a complete afterthought and staying that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rodeo said:

It has been really weird to watch this team go from Sam Mills to Thomas Davis to Dan Morgan to Jon Beason to Luke Kuchly to.... being content with Josey Jewell. Linebackers used to be our DNA and now are a complete afterthought and staying that way.

I don't mind no longer dumping massive resources into the position but striking a balance between the two approaches would be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, rodeo said:

It has been really weird to watch this team go from Sam Mills to Thomas Davis to Dan Morgan to Jon Beason to Luke Kuchly to.... being content with Josey Jewell. Linebackers used to be our DNA and now are a complete afterthought and staying that way.

100% agree.  LB and then to a much lesser extent but still a thing was DL.   We at least know we largely where going to have the defensive front 7 intact year to year pending injury didn't derail it.   

I can handle moving away from being RB central but the D is a bit tough to see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow I can’t believe the panthers tried to trade up, failed, but still got the guy they wanted to trade up for. I wonder if anyone else has ever said that next you’ll tell me they had Hunter and Brazzell graded as first rounders. 
    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option is a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The pattern it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  Probably should have been drafted day three anyway. The other was way over drafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
×
×
  • Create New...