Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread


Recommended Posts

Two things I completely nailed in week one:

- Arch Manning hype was utterly absurd

- Bill Belichick hype was utterly absurd 

Manning literally couldn't beat out a 5th round draft pick and in one case the current Oregon St. starting QB. Somehow we are supposed to believe that a kid that is being billed as literally one of the greatest QB's in college football history to the extent that they ranked his team #1 yet somehow sat for two years behind an oft injured Quinn Ewers? Never won that job from Ewers last season, either. Three years of college football and this kid still looks like a college freshman.

Bill Belichick couldn't get employed in the NFL because the game had obviously passed him by and he has no ability to handle anything less than complete control. What could possibly go wrong when a stubborn, inflexible 73 year old on his first CAREER CFB job gets paired with a historically bottom half/third college football program in a P5 conference??? Well, welcome to college football, Bill's GF. Turns out massive roster turnover and just simply telling everyone you are the "33rd NFL team" doesn't erase the advantages that dozens and dozens of football programs have over you because that's the way college football has always been. 

 

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

As I mentioned earlier, Carolina to the SEC would be an absolute disaster for them.  Vandy would love it though, there would be a new whipping boy.

Most of the ACC would fare similarly. Maryland is a far more accomplished football program historically and they have yet to ever finish above .500 in conference play since leaving the ACC. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tbe said:

Odds Bill comes back next year?

I think he dreams of being begged back to the NFL but it's a false dream. Could it happen? Yes. Is it likely? Definitely not. 

I don't anticipate him becoming suddenly self reflective or less stubborn although this college experiment is likely to end in a comically massive failure. 

The real question is how bad will it be for UNC when they have to buy out his son's HC contract?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Most of the ACC would fare similarly. Maryland is a far more accomplished football program historically and they have yet to ever finish above .500 in conference play since leaving the ACC. 

Exactly what I mentioned earlier, same with SC.  They follow the money, they will be a laughing stock.  Would not be a good move for any ACC school.  Which reportedly Clemson is out, each school has to be approved by the SEC board and in a test vote Clemson and FSU was a no go

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Most of the ACC would fare similarly. Maryland is a far more accomplished football program historically and they have yet to ever finish above .500 in conference play since leaving the ACC. 

You think Maryland is a more prestigious football program than UNC?

You’re my guy, kfd, but that’s a wild take.  I actually think the ACC has never gotten the love it deserves for football.  There is a lot of tradition and prestige to a lot of the teams in the conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HPPantherzfan said:

Exactly what I mentioned earlier, same with SC.  They follow the money, they will be a laughing stock.  Would not be a good move for any ACC school.  Which reportedly Clemson is out, each school has to be approved by the SEC board and in a test vote Clemson and FSU was a no go

 

Damn, I didn’t know they were considering moving.  These new conferences and the constant moving of teams is complete ass.  But that is shocking for those two schools considering their pipelines and prestige.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Damn, I didn’t know they were considering moving.  These new conferences and the constant moving of teams is complete ass.  But that is shocking for those two schools considering their pipelines and prestige.

Yea I know, if the SEC was going to take any ACC schools it would be one of those two.

https://247sports.com/college/south-carolina/board/44/contents/sec-turns-down-fsu-and-clemson-233705974/?page=2

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

You think Maryland is a more prestigious football program than UNC?

You’re my guy, kfd, but that’s a wild take.  I actually think the ACC has never gotten the love it deserves for football.  There is a lot of tradition and prestige to a lot of the teams in the conference.

Easily so. 1 "National Championship", 11 conference titles.

UNC can boast 0 and 7.

Maryland is less so since they have left the ACC and will likely remain depressed for the remainder of their existence before the Big Ten collapses. 

I agree about the ACC and its football history but truthfully, it is becoming harder for the ACC to compete in the super conference era with the extreme amounts of money it takes to just stay competitive, much less excel. 

UNC is very odd case. On the surface, plenty of money to spend to attempt to become a relevant football program but then you spend it on....Bill Belichick??? That's....stupid.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hulu +Live: $88.78 Amazon Prime: $16.00 (w/FanDuel: $36.12) Apple TV+: $10.66 Netflix:$26.68 Is all still $80 less per month than what I was paying for DirecTV when I gave it up a few years ago. 
    • I just don't know that he has the time to turn it around at his age. His age is going to be a major strike against him in the recruiting trail and it's just a tough row to hoe to turn a football program around. One good recruiting class can turn around a basketball team. Hell, one individual recruit can turna around a basketball team - Carmelo Anthony basically won a national championship single handedly at Syracuse. Cam at Auburn is the only college who even comes close to that type of impact off the top of my head. A good recruiting class is 2-3 years down the road from significantly impacting a college football program... if you can actually keep them around. The instant impact is in the portal but everyone else is chasing those guys too. If I was building a college program, I'd focus almost exclusively on the trenches starting out. To me, that's the big difference in college. The better teams dominate the trenches. There's just a LOT more talent disparity at the college level than there is the NFL level. The worst teams in the NFL are still full of guys who were all conference or all American at the college level. The gap between the best team in the NFL and the tenth best team in the NFL is pretty small. A couple of plays might be the difference. The #1 team in the country is probably going to be a 10 point favorite over the #10 team at the college level. The gap on talent between the #1 team and the #32 team is a massive gulf. The #1 team's backups would be competitive against the #32 team. I just don't know if Belichick after a career in the NFL was prepared for the level of talent disparity he was going to face.
    • I wouldn't drop David Moore, honestly. Moore, while long in the tooth and light in production, is about the only veteran presence in the WR room now and the only one with extensive experience with what Canales wants and needs. And that's probably why he made the roster. Still, aging safeties who might make a decent gunner just aren't where you want to spend your money and roster spots. Even at vet minimum, he's not going to be as cheap or maybe as trainable as some UDFA who would run through a brick wall for a roster spot for rookie league minimum and a chance.
×
×
  • Create New...