Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread


Joe Bear
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, csx said:

There are no qbs in that list at all but Dart as you mentioned was 25th and hes the only rookie QB looking like anything so far.

Drafting high means almost nothing 

As demonstrated by the value teams place in those picks, right?

There are busts drafted every year and there are steals to be found later but by and large the higher you're drafting the better your odds are of finding good talent, hence why those picks are so valued.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Why does Charlotte absolutely suck regardless of who the coach is, guy had Ohio competing for conference titles every year. Charlotte gets blown out by a team that went 2/6 passing. You would think they could recruit better talent than Army

Playing Army, Navy or Air Force in the middle of the season is the kiss of death for any school that doesn't have the natural talent to overcome the option scheme.  One week of practice isn't enough to prepare for stopping their offense for a roster like Charlotte's.

There's a reason those military schools win 8+ games (almost) every year while having minimal football talent on their rosters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...