Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sure seems like folks might have gotten ahead of themselves raving about this amazing QB class.

 

One smart QB guy never was buying manning, he said " the guy couldn't beat out ewers and he's awful, buyer beware is isn't a typical manning." 

That ewers comment does hurt.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

 

One smart QB guy never was buying manning, he said " the guy couldn't beat out ewers and he's awful, buyer beware is isn't a typical manning." 

That ewers comment does hurt.....

I said it all year last year. If Arch is anywhere close to what he's hyped to be they're really screwing up playing Ewers over him. I mean, Ewers was a good college QB but he's not a guy who should've been keeping a #1 overall pick type talent on the bench. Then we saw Arch and his Uncle Rico throwing and it was like.... OHHHHH... now I see. LOL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This season is about two things that impact the Ws and Ls 1. Can Young be, or ever  be, a top 15 qb 2. Can Evero be a decent DC  my personal feeling is time may be up for one and the other’s time should’ve been up before season start  regardless of my personal feels, I’m glad football is back and hope to be proved wrong every Sunday 
    • The point was, largely it was cool to be critical of select players all off season (XL) and not be questioned about your fandom, being negative…..but select folks react different if done to Bryce.    and if XL had an army of defenders (which he didn’t) there would be plenty of “derailment” as you say.  But people largely accepted you should be able to be critical of XL. Therefore the good and bad were BOTH largely accepted convo.  I have no clue about your joke analogy.  Racist jokes suck.  Jokes about race can be funny.  I do know some people view it all as the same thing. 
    • I am not sure that would necessarily hold up to a large data sample and some in depth analysis. It's certainly an interesting theory.  IMO(anecdotally), the better backups are usually older backups that were above average NFL starters for long periods of time. That and just guys that are always fringe bottom third starter, top third backups. Flacco, Dalton are current examples of the former. I think guys like Tyrod Taylor and Jacoby Brissett are good examples of the latter.  The issue with Lance/Richardson/Wilson is that they were ultimately big busts. So you have to bank on them being the type of player that can handle that, battle back and make a decent NFL career. I am not sure I would say that is the majority of those type of players. Winston is just a different thing. He is an old school gunslinger that is pretty inflexible when it comes to playing style. If you don't have an old school offense tailored to a Brett Favre type gunslinger AND have a defense elite enough to win when he is turning the ball over like gangbusters.....it's tough for him to consistently win games. It will be damn fun to watch but the W's are gonna be rare.
×
×
  • Create New...