Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coach asked about Coker!!

Doc LRB

By Doc LRB,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Luciu5 Veteran

Luciu5

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

The trade up into the 1st still infuriates me. Height of fuging hubris.

We traded 1 spot so we have a 5th year option. 1 spot dude. Personally, I get the logic behind wanting the 5th year option on a WR. I don't think hubris has anything to do with it. And it's not like we gave up more than the equivalent of a 7th rounder to move 1 spot. Basically we got a 5th year option on XL for next to nothing. Really not that big of a deal.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

I don't think people realize just how in danger Adam Thielen is with Coker's emergence. I keep hearing XL but AT is who Coker makes the most expendable.

You can add TMac, XL, Coker, Renfrow, Horn and Moore all together and their cap hit is on par with AT.   Morgan literally just paid him.  I was against it. But Morgan taking that big dead cap hit right after paying him would be admitting a pretty big mistake…which doesn’t seem very front office-ish. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CRA said:

You can add TMac, XL, Coker, Renfrow, Horn and Moore all together and their cap hit is on par with AT.   Morgan literally just paid him.  I was against it. But Morgan taking that big dead cap hit right after paying him would be admitting a pretty big mistake…which doesn’t seem very front office-ish. 

 

Well he was the only consistently effective WR that Bryce had chemistry with. It just kind of was what it was.

I suspect he will prove to still be the #1 target, although I would love for some of our higher potential guys like Tmac, Coker, etc to start stealing those targets. 

AT is near the end. No sense in investing a ton of targets for a guy that has a very short career window left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
Just now, Davidson Deac II said:

Barring some trade or injury, there are four receivers guaranteed to be on the roster when we play Jacksonville.

Thielen

Coker

Legette

TMac.  

Assuming we keep 6, the other two spots are up for grabs.  Renfrow looks like the favorite for #5, not sure about the last one.  

I would say Renfrow may be on shakier ground than most simply due to health. If that hadn't been the case, I have no doubt he would be a lock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Well he was the only consistently effective WR that Bryce had chemistry with. It just kind of was what it was.

I suspect he will prove to still be the #1 target, although I would love for some of our higher potential guys like Tmac, Coker, etc to start stealing those targets. 

AT is near the end. No sense in investing a ton of targets for a guy that has a very short career window left.

You throw the ball to the guy who gives you the best chance to win at the moment you are throwing it.  

If the rest of the group is as good as we think, then we use Thielen as a Ricky Proehl type.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, thunderraiden said:

I don't think people realize just how in danger Adam Thielen is with Coker's emergence. I keep hearing XL but AT is who Coker makes the most expendable.

I think AT gets traded at the deadline and Moore comes up from the practice squad (if we can stash him) and that’s our final WR room 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Barring some trade or injury, there are four receivers guaranteed to be on the roster when we play Jacksonville.

Thielen

Coker

Legette

TMac.  

Assuming we keep 6, the other two spots are up for grabs.  Renfrow looks like the favorite for #5, not sure about the last one.  

Horn should make it for special teams as a return option

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Top Available FAs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • WUnderhill
      Canes vs Vegas Gm 5 SCF 8PM

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • tukafan21
      Top Available FAs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...