Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coach asked about Coker!!


Doc LRB
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

I think AT gets traded at the deadline and Moore comes up from the practice squad (if we can stash him) and that’s our final WR room 

I think the Huddle dramatically overvalues AT in any trade scenario. 

He has high value here because we lacked any consistent, reliable options. Also he had great chemistry with Bryce. 

He isn't going to be a good fit for a lot of teams/schemes/rosters.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I would say Renfrow may be on shakier ground than most simply due to health. If that hadn't been the case, I have no doubt he would be a lock.

Renfrow’s health really was all tied to a diagnosis that got figured out.  It’s not like he is  is the Clemson variant of Jaycee Horn where he can’t stay healthy.  

Renfrow to me is just niche play.  Do you want that or don’t you in your O.   To me to historically doesn’t fit Canales but it would be ideal for BY’s natural play style.  What hurt’s Renfrow the most is they paid AT to hog up slot reps.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think the Huddle dramatically overvalues AT in any trade scenario. 

He has high value here because we lacked any consistent, reliable options. Also he had great chemistry with Bryce. 

He isn't going to be a good fit for a lot of teams/schemes/rosters.

Of course, but he is a good fit for a few (49ers for example) and injuries happen. I don’t think we’re getting a 2nd for him or anything but I could see us trading him for a 6th round and cap relief then rolling with TMac, Coker, Horn, XL, Moore, maybe Renfrow 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jb2288 said:

Of course, but he is a good fit for a few (49ers for example) and injuries happen. I don’t think we’re getting a 2nd for him or anything but I could see us trading him for a 6th round and cap relief then rolling with TMac, Coker, Horn, XL, Moore, maybe Renfrow 

kindof depends on our record at the deadline and how Bryce and co are playing.  If its all gone to hell then move what you can, if we are clawing our way in it then keep status quo.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think the Huddle dramatically overvalues AT in any trade scenario. 

He has high value here because we lacked any consistent, reliable options. Also he had great chemistry with Bryce. 

He isn't going to be a good fit for a lot of teams/schemes/rosters.

No good team that would want his “skills” wants 10 million cap hit for Ricky Prohel to come off the bench. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think the Huddle dramatically overvalues AT in any trade scenario. 

He has high value here because we lacked any consistent, reliable options. Also he had great chemistry with Bryce. 

He isn't going to be a good fit for a lot of teams/schemes/rosters.

He could fetch a 4th or 5th round pick if he's not already IR'd by the trade deadline.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

Renfrow’s health really was all tied to a diagnosis that got figured out.  It’s not like he is  is the Clemson variant of Jaycee Horn where he can’t stay healthy.  

Renfrow to me is just niche play.  Do you want that or don’t you in your O.   To me to historically doesn’t fit Canales but it would be ideal for BY’s natural play style.  What hurt’s Renfrow the most is they paid AT to hog up slot reps.  

To me, if it comes down to making a tough decision you gotta think about the future. We aren't competing for a SB this year. We're trying to drag ourselves out of the cellar while building toward the future. If you have to make a cut at WR that you don't want to make I think you have to cut the 35 year old who was already considering retirement. Hell, let him announce his retirement to save face but then process the paperwork as a cut so he's still paid his guarantees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncsfinest21 said:

I love Coker but to write XL off because of a fight and not see how he has improved yet is rather insane to me right now.

Tune in this week for totally different hot takes, heroes and bums.   Such is life this time of year.    All it would take is XL housing one, Renfrow alligator arming a ball, Moore being clutch and the huddle will redo the depth chart quicker you can imagine.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...