Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coach asked about Coker!!


Doc LRB
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, CRA said:

If you were to take the Time Machine back though..

DeVante Adams had less yards, less TDs, and a HIGHER drop % than XL as a rookie with prime Aaron Rodgers throwing the ball to him.  DeVante Adams was never going to be “DeVante Adams” either.   Adams had a rough start to the NFL.  In fact his next year was worse than his rookie year…and was regarded as one of the worst WRs playing in the NFL. 

people forget that journey to the top. One of the best dig yourself out of the grave stories of the last couple decades given he made it to largely being regarded as the best in the business. 

*not saying it happens with XL,  but DeVante is an example of why you don’t count someone out, not one of why someone is hopeless. 

Seems you shut a lot of that down. There basically is no comeback for this post. Good job! The I don't want to write this kid off but I am going to write this kid off posts and takes have been insane about XL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

If you were to take the Time Machine back though..

DeVante Adams had less yards, less TDs, and a HIGHER drop % than XL as a rookie with prime Aaron Rodgers throwing the ball to him.  DeVante Adams was never going to be “DeVante Adams” either.   Adams had a rough start to the NFL.  In fact his next year was worse than his rookie year…and was regarded as one of the worst WRs playing in the NFL. 

people forget that journey to the top. One of the best dig yourself out of the grave stories of the last couple decades given he made it to largely being regarded as the best in the business. 

*not saying it happens with XL,  but DeVante is an example of why you don’t count someone out, not one of why someone is hopeless. 

This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's.

Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended). 

So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue.

I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/11/2025 at 11:39 PM, Proudiddy said:

I say all that to say, in summary, Coker is the better WR as of now and honestly, might remain so, but XL is a weapon in his own right - his numbers from his rookie season indicate he isn't just some washout or bust.

Love how you have infinite patience for XL but gave up on Kon Knueppel after the first half of his first preseason game. Never saw a "Surprise! Tet looks really bad!" thread after he dropped a TD pass.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/11/2025 at 3:58 PM, kungfoodude said:

Even without this TC/offseason, Coker proved that last year too. 

He is simply the far better prepared NFL player. 

I get the ceiling difference, I think we all do. But if you can't reach that ceiling, what was it worth?

Have to get off the floor first, before reaching for the ceiling.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2025 at 4:50 PM, kungfoodude said:

This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's.

Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended). 

So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue.

I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.

I appreciate the argument, and ill let y'all handle the numbers...  But, I'm gonna toss my hat in the ring with the "eye test."  XL doesn't look like a bust.  Period.  I think bringing up Mingo and TMJ were apt comparisons because of where they were drafted and the expectations, and both were complete busts.  TMJ looked useable in his latter years here, but still struggled to make significant strides.  XL had utility as a rookie that neither Mingo or TMJ had.  Yes, XL left some significant plays on the field as a rookie, but he also made some that the other guys he's being comped to didn't and couldn't, and again, this is all while trying to find his footing in an offense with a rookie coach, rookie OC, and a QB position in flux.  And look at what XL is doing in camp this year...  He is making plays.  The drops don't seem to be a thing.  He is creating separation as a receiver, not relying on motion or gadgetry, and he has improved significantly as a route runner.  XL will be just fine and is a great piece to a young, deep receiving corps.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I appreciate the argument, and ill let y'all handle the numbers...  But, I'm gonna toss my hat in the ring with the "eye test."  XL doesn't look like a bust.  Period.  I think bringing up Mingo and TMJ were apt comparisons because of where they were drafted and the expectations, and both were complete busts.  TMJ looked useable in his latter years here, but still struggled to make significant strides.  XL had utility as a rookie that neither Mingo or TMJ had.  Yes, XL left some significant plays on the field as a rookie, but he also made some that the other guys he's being comped to didn't and couldn't, and again, this is all while trying to find his footing in an offense with a rookie coach, rookie OC, and a QB position in flux.  And look at what XL is doing in camp this year...  He is making plays.  The drops don't seem to be a thing.  He is creating separation as a receiver, not relying on motion or gadgetry, and he has improved significantly as a route runner.  XL will be just fine and is a great piece to a young, deep receiving corps.

I think we just fundamentally disagree on where he is at career wise. It was a pretty rough first year and we are in the golden age of rookie WR's showing out. To be sure he had difficulties to deal with outside his control but he still looks extremely unpolished.

I am a glass half empty guy on XL and you are a glass half full guy.

Hopefully we are on the same page in the 2026 offseason and it's the glass just being full.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we assume Evero and his scheme remain in place, he'd technically be either a nose guard or a 3-4 style defensive end. Not necessarily a pass rusher, but a guy with the potential to play alongside Derrick Brown and make our defensive line a stone wall. I can get on board with this, but I'd hope we also make other offseason moves to improve our pass rush. 
    • Lol some of you kill me. He hasn’t even played two full seasons, he’s already trusted enough to call the plays, is only 22 years old, is leading an incredibly improved defense, and some of you act like he’s garbage. 
    • Right now, all that means is that an option is likely to be exercised. We were keeping him for year four no matter what and we will probably keep him around for year five. Both of those years would be at what could be considered reasonable fees for a QB. What kind of QB? Where on the depth chart? Doesn't say a thing. Not one damned thing about it. And that's because we don't know what we have yet from Bryce, still. But let's be honest about a few things since Canales came along. We are actually showing the kind of progress you want from a head coach. He inherited a run down, poorly assembled team that was more used to being doormats and losers than anything else. And he elevated the squad with limited resources last year, even at one point benching the starting #1 pick QB for poor performance and keeping him from starting until another injury forced his hand. And somehow, with a historically bad defense, we managed to win some games that we had no right doing and playing a couple of other championship level teams to a near deadlock. And we moved into this season with Bryce back under center and we've had some serious ups and downs for the third year QB. And the rest of the team. We're getting better but we are far from a finished product, especially at QB. But we are sitting here with a winning record and two wins against teams where the betting line had us at 10 point underdogs. We actually have a shot at the playoffs. Last year, that would have been completely unbelievable. So, here we are looking at giving Bryce that coveted 5th year option and the money and commitment that comes with it. What does that do? Well, it gives Canales and Bryce another season to fix what is broken and to grow, which he is (in fits and starts). Can Canales coax that record setting Bryce out a bit more? He did against LA last week. Maybe there's more growing to happen there. And well, as much as we might kick the walls at that thought, it would be good for everything to finally pay out on that gamble we made.  But what it doesn't do... It doesn't lock us into not drafting a QB again, possibly one on Day 2 or 3 of the draft to keep Bryce's seat warm and to groom for the future. It also doesn't prevent us from snagging a FA QB out there if the right one comes along that Canales feels more confident. And if another team with a desperate need at QB or a good team in need of a quality back up comes sniffing around, there are two years on a decent contract available for trade. There's no lose in exercising the option. There are some opportunities.
×
×
  • Create New...