BREAKiNG NEWS: Panthers interested in trading for Trey Hendrickson

[Paa Langfart]

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is like saying "yeah, I'd trade a double wide trailer, an '82 Firebird that's not running, and a scratch off lottery ticket for your mansion... oh, and I'm only willing to pay half the property taxes"

With the poo going on in my life right now I need a good laugh.  Thanks - you gave it to me .

[uncfan888]

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

If a first is even on the table for our FO we're cooked for the foreseeable future boys.

They give up a first with the state of this roster and the league should force Tepper to sell. Or relegate us to the cfl

[kungfoodude]

1 minute ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

They aren’t going to get their asking price. Bengals aren’t going to trade him to a division rival. He will go to Indy most likely. 
 

You could probably get him for Corbett OR Christensen, One of the rookie edges OR Wonnum and like a 3rd. 
 

but I’m not really a fan of it.

Corbett and BC are basically worth very little.

That's one reason why I don't want to get involved in a trade if they want a lot of compensation. We have little in the way of valuable players, almost all of them we shouldn't be considering giving up. That leaves draft compensation carrying the weight if we don't give up a big player. Also something we shouldn't be giving up.

[CmC2k]

The Bengals are absolutely delusional if they think they are gonna get anything close to that asking price. Just look back to the Brian Burns trade where we only got a 2nd, a 5th and a additional 5th round conditional pick in the following draft. Burns was in his prime at age 26 wanting 30 million a year and while Hendrickson might be a reasonably better player he's going to be 31 this season and is also seeking a contract around 30 million a year also.

You can argue whether you would've made the Burns deal or not but the point is that a precedent was set for what an elite pass rusher going into their franchise tag year was worth. 

I'd offer them a 3rd and they can pick 2 between DJ wonnum, Adam Thelien or a 5th round pick. 

As for the contract something like 3 years at 30 million seems like a good fit and I trust Brant Tillis to make the numbers work with the cap. 

Edited Sunday at 07:52 PM by CmC2k

[ProcessBlue2]

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Corbett and BC are basically worth very little.

That's one reason why I don't want to get involved in a trade if they want a lot of compensation. We have little in the way of valuable players, almost all of them we shouldn't be considering giving up. That leaves draft compensation carrying the weight if we don't give up a big player. Also something we shouldn't be giving up.

More valuable for them than us. Their OL is 2021 for us bad. I’ll be shocked if Burrow plays 10 games this season tbh. 
 

 

Edited Sunday at 07:51 PM by ProcessBlue2

[tukafan21]

22 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You are dreaming 

 

19 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

David Moore?

He has no value to them. He isn't a tradeable asset.

The rub is that he is going to want a big contract because it is likely his last chance. $20 mil is very unlikely to work.

That's the real thing about all this, you have to be sure you can extend him or it was all for naught. 

 

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is like saying "yeah, I'd trade a double wide trailer, an '82 Firebird that's not running, and a scratch off lottery ticket for your mansion... oh, and I'm only willing to pay half the property taxes"

 

17 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

This isn’t Madden where you could send DJ Johnson straight up for him 

 

lol at everyone calling me crazy but ignoring my very next line saying he’d cost us more than that trade.

My point was if we can get him for a player we’re gonna cut and the player he’d replace in the lineup, without giving up even a 3rd, and getting him on a deal cheaper than he wants, then yea, I’m in.

But not at the cost of what the Bengals will want and the contract he’ll need, not for a 31 year old when we have two promising rookies who need snaps this year.

[kungfoodude]

2 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

More valuable for them than us. Their OL is 2021 for us bad. I’ll be shocked if Burrow plays 10 games this season tbh. 
 

 

BC wouldn't start there and Corbett is a massive injury risk. 

If they wanted BC, they literally could have signed him in free agency. 

[kungfoodude]

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

 

 

 

lol at everyone calling me crazy but ignoring my very next line saying he’d cost us more than that trade.

My point was if we can get him for a player we’re gonna cut and the player he’d replace in the lineup, without giving up even a 3rd, and getting him on a deal cheaper than he wants, then yea, I’m in.

But not at the cost of what the Bengals will want and the contract he’ll need, not for a 31 year old when we have two promising rookies who need snaps this year.

We have zero players on this roster that a single NFL team would trade for that are on the cut line. That's a downside of having the worst roster in the league.

Edited Sunday at 07:59 PM by kungfoodude

[CRA]

It’s says the want 2 impact players and draft picks.

we literally only have 2 impact quality players on the entire roster 

[LinvilleGorge]

10 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

 

 

 

lol at everyone calling me crazy but ignoring my very next line saying he’d cost us more than that trade.

My point was if we can get him for a player we’re gonna cut and the player he’d replace in the lineup, without giving up even a 3rd, and getting him on a deal cheaper than he wants, then yea, I’m in.

But not at the cost of what the Bengals will want and the contract he’ll need, not for a 31 year old when we have two promising rookies who need snaps this year.

Well yeah, everyone would trade trash for treasure. That goes without saying.

[kungfoodude]

1 minute ago, CRA said:

It’s says the want 2 impact players and draft picks.

we literally only have 2 impact quality players on the entire roster 

They aren't going to get that from anyone for Hendrickson. He is on the wrong side of 30 and gonna be very pricey to boot.

They are going to Bungle it.

[CRA]

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

They aren't going to get that from anyone for Hendrickson. He is on the wrong side of 30 and gonna be very pricey to boot.

They are going to Bungle it.

Sure, they won’t get their ask but I would assume it’s draft picks we can’t afford or one player we can’t 

[kungfoodude]

Just now, CRA said:

Sure, they won’t get their ask but I would assume it’s draft picks we can’t afford or one player we can’t 

Yeah, that is why I don’t think we will do it. 

We haven't made any horrifying trades under Dan yet. If that does happen, I suppose we have our answer at GM. We need a new one.

[TheSpecialJuan]

Give or take this is what I think a potential panthers trade offer for Trey Hendrickson would look like! #KeepPounding

https://x.com/thecarpnetwork/status/1957140512856498597?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA