Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we all admit it now?


 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

When people keep bringing that up, remind them that Rhule’s first season included Teddy blowing chances to beat GB and KC who were the 2 playoff #1 seeds that year and Rhule started off his second season 3-1 with a close loss to Dallas and Darnold had 10 total TDs in those 4 games. Even with that, Rhule was universally disliked and booted in year 3 so the Philly/KC games mean nothing. We’ve gotten worse since Rhule and it honestly feels a lot further away from the playoffs.

Great example.  What has Sam Darnold done since we got rid of him?

I'm not saying we should have kept him but it turns out he has a lot of talent but our coaching staff at the time were morons.  Same with Baker.  I've got a good friend who is a diehard Browns player and would loooooooovvve to have Baker back.  Should have never traded him but that's the Browns.  I don't want us to be the Browns.

This are all instances of teams/fans that give up on players too soon, don't see how coaching and situations effect a QB's development.  If Darnold had gotten drafted by a team with a decent coaching staff he may have figured it out sooner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Show me anyone who has been as bad as Bryce through 30 games and turned into a serviceable player much less a star. Getting 30 games while being as terrible as he has been is a monumental achievement in and of itself.

Sam Darnold and Geno Smith recently.

Jake Plummer, Jim Plunkett, Doug Williams, Tommy Maddox, Steve Young, Drew Brees, Rich Gannon, Alex Smith, Vinny Testaverde, Terry Bradshaw.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

People saying he was too small and would never hold up in the NFL.  Dude can take a shot.  People saying he doesn't have the ability to throw down the field.  That great pass in game 1 from this year that Nola should have caught in the endzone was 43 yards in the air.  He can make all the throws.

They said he can't throw when pressured.  Was one of the top QB's under pressure over the 2nd half of last season.  
They said he doesn't throw deep.  Had one of the highest deep pass attempts in the league over the 2nd half of the season.
They said, Oh, well, he can but he's not good at it.  Of those deep passes he was one of the most accurate despite a high drop rate by his receivers.

People keep saying it's been 3 years.  That's enough time to see he sucks.  In reality it's been 2 years and 2 games.  There is no way I'll ever believe his rookie year didn't set him back.  No matter what was said it was a horrible situation on every level.  We are trying to come out of and build from that Frank Reich year which I hope was the bottom of the barrel.  I've never seen a worse situation for a rookie QB, maybe for any QB. 

I don't think it's that much of a stretch after how bad that year was for any players development to set it aside and say that year doesn't paint an accurate picture.    

I'm not even arguing for Bryce in so much as I'm arguing to have more patience and quit with the hyperbole and over the top statement or outright lies.  It's only because a handful of the same people have hated Bryce since he was drafted and have rarely given him credit for what he has done and can do.

It's the lack of an accurate representation of Bryce and our situation and the development of players.

2021 - It was Derrick Brown's 2nd year, week 11.  He was benched.  Calls to trade him.  He sucks.  The Panthers are cursed.  Fast forward a few years and he has developed into one of the best players on the team and a Captain.  

I don't know if Bryce will spiral and completely bust or if it's just a rocky road to stardom like so many players before him.  We have very little to lose and everything to gain by staying the course right now.


 

1. He is too small.  Have you not seen the fact the ball has been flying out of his hands the past 2 Sundays?  You know we can't really QB sneak in Carolina right?  I mean is he maybe a little tougher than some might think? Sure.  But that doesn't mean he isn't too small. 

2.  He can't make all the throws and many of his throws just flat out stink.  His vertical and sideline throws generally stink.  See week 1.  I can't say see week 2 because he didn't attempt any.   You doing a whole lot of ignoring week 1 and letting one okay ball to a LOT of talking.  Essentially every ball minus one that went downfield stunk.  

3.  now you are getting into that 2024 PFF deep ball nonsense and I'm not doing anymore of that.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

bruh

Way to counter my argument.  I concede.

Drew Brees' second year (2003):

Starts: 11
Record: 2-9
Passing: 2,108 yards
Completion %: 57.6%
Touchdowns: 11
Interceptions: 15
Passer Rating: ~67.5

Bryce Youngs' second year (2024):

Starts: 14
Record: 5-7
Passing: 2,403 yards
Completion %: 60.9%
Touchdowns: 15
Interceptions: 9
Passer Rating: ~82.2

I am not saying Bryce is going to turn into Brees.  But this is a great comparison to prove my point that guys can take time to develop and other QB's have come back from situations comparable to Bryces to not only be serviceable but outright stars. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Way to counter my argument.  I concede.

Drew Brees' second year (2003):

Starts: 11
Record: 2-9
Passing: 2,108 yards
Completion %: 57.6%
Touchdowns: 11
Interceptions: 15
Passer Rating: ~67.5

Bryce Youngs' second year (2024):

Starts: 14
Record: 5-7
Passing: 2,403 yards
Completion %: 60.9%
Touchdowns: 15
Interceptions: 9
Passer Rating: ~82.2

I am not saying Bryce is going to turn into Brees.  But this is a great comparison to prove my point that guys can take time to develop and other QB's have come back from situations comparable to Bryces to not only be serviceable but outright stars. 

Brees went 8-8 his first year as starter.  Holy cherry pick lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Way to counter my argument.  I concede.

Drew Brees' second year (2003):

Starts: 11
Record: 2-9
Passing: 2,108 yards
Completion %: 57.6%
Touchdowns: 11
Interceptions: 15
Passer Rating: ~67.5

Bryce Youngs' second year (2024):

Starts: 14
Record: 5-7
Passing: 2,403 yards
Completion %: 60.9%
Touchdowns: 15
Interceptions: 9
Passer Rating: ~82.2

I am not saying Bryce is going to turn into Brees.  But this is a great comparison to prove my point that guys can take time to develop and other QB's have come back from situations comparable to Bryces to not only be serviceable but outright stars. 

If that's what you are clinging to then God bless, you are beyond reach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Sam Darnold and Geno Smith recently.

Jake Plummer, Jim Plunkett, Doug Williams, Tommy Maddox, Steve Young, Drew Brees, Rich Gannon, Alex Smith, Vinny Testaverde, Terry Bradshaw.

 

Calling Darnold a "success" is laughable.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bruh?

Is Sam Darnold not serviceable?  Did he not have a great year last year with the Vikings?  He just went 22-33 for 295 yards with 2 TD and 2 picks in a win over the Steelers.  How is this wrong?

Combined two-year totals which includes Drew's 8-8 record in his first year:
Drew Brees
Record: 10-17
Passing: 5,392 yards
Touchdowns: 28
Interceptions: 31
Passer Rating: 67.5

Bryce Young
Record: 10-17
Passing: 5,280 yards
Touchdowns: 26
Interceptions: 19
Passer Rating: 77.95

This even forces me to include Bryce horrible first year and it's still comparable.

What am I missing now?  Does the climate out west for Drew make a difference when compared to east coast weather in comparison?  There is never going to be an exact match.  It's why I shared so many.

What is so freakin difficult is seeing that some NFL QB's have had similar starts to their career as Bryce, including getting benched or traded but still went on to be serviceable, much less a star?  That is literally all I'm saying here which is  direct response to George's "Show me anyone who has been as bad as Bryce through 30 games and turned into a serviceable player much less a star."

The fact that you can't concede even small points is very telling.  What I'm saying here isn't even controversial.  

I feel like I'm in the football version of Idiocracy.

Edited by Loyalty4Life
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

no one is going to take you seriously when you're pulling in doug williams and jim plunketts of the world. you're just listing QBs who had a fluke not terrible season later in their career, and you're butchering that. Like Tommy Maddox is kill on site in Pittsburgh. 

you're sea lioning in defense of the biggest (shortest) qb bust of the modern era. 

 

Edited by electro's horse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30 Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
    • He isn't a good HC. I think he has proved that conclusively.
    • The missed tackle percentage is on that screen cap.
×
×
  • Create New...