Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mr. Limited


FutureDynasty
 Share

Recommended Posts

At the end of the day, Young doesn’t offer enough to make up for the limited scheme he requires. He’d have to be laser accurate and make little to no mistakes to dink-and-dunk 50 times a game and win consistently at this level.

What’s worse is that even when it all goes to plan that’s a lot of hospital balls shortening the career of the recievers. I felt bad for Sanders and Renfrow in week 2. 

Nice drives every now and then aren’t going to cut it. Every guy we’ve trotted out there since Cam has been able to impress in spurts.  If Young can’t do that consistently and prevents us from having a deep ball what are we doing?

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

On X they are hyping him up bc currently he’s no. 10 in the league in pass yards. 

Thanks for pointing this out. In looking at the data. Bryce has the most pass attempts (90) which is the same number of attempts as 40 year old Joe Flacco. He and Flacco also have the same yard per pass attempt (5.4). But as you might expect. 40 year old Flacco still has more passing yards.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

On X they are hyping him up bc currently he’s no. 10 in the league in pass yards. 

panther twitter might be the dumbest collective of morons on the internet.   

 

This dumb fug is blaming the wr's and still thinks bryce is it.  https://x.com/4MR_Fetti/status/1967368569873985574

 

imagine for a moment being this stupid

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

panther twitter might be the dumbest collective of morons on the internet.   

 

This dumb fug is blaming the wr's and still thinks bryce is it.  https://x.com/4MR_Fetti/status/1967368569873985574

 

imagine for a moment being this stupid

It's less stupidity and more simple delusion than anything. Then there are some like certain posters here who have carried water for him for so long they seem like they might legitimately need a welfare check at some point down the line.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

It's less stupidity and more simple delusion than anything. Then there are some like certain posters here who have carried water for him for so long they seem like they might legitimately need a welfare check at some point down the line.

I mean to watch that game yesterday and to come to that conclusion is either trolling or velcro shoe level insanity

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...