Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young Is a Symptom, Not the Disease


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Going back to the op, I sort of stopped at the anger mention.

If Bryce Young were a down draft flyer like he should have been, there wouldn’t be any anger because they wouldn’t keep shoving bad QB play down our throats in that situation. He’d just be gone and replaced by the next guy. No big deal. He would merely be a footnote in team history. 
 

We are not mad at him per se, we are for sure sick of watching him play quarterback for the team. And we get mad at the turnovers and subpar performance. That happens with every crappy QB and it comes with the territory. 
 

The only thing that gets you grace when you are stinking it up, is a track record of previous success. He has not earned any grace really, because he only has like one really good game in the bank. In 2 1/3 seasons and is showing no improvement this year. Just the same issues again. 

 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2025 at 8:28 AM, frankw said:

There are many unfortunate truths about this franchise. None of them change the fact that Bryce Young has basically no physical tools.

Brother you are being a simp. Nobody is blaming Bryce for literally everything. We're saying trying to build a successful NFL offense around his glaring deficiencies is not feasible and that was the catastrophic mistake we made in selecting him. It is what it is.

Here is the video.

Bryce Young doesn't make this throw. He wouldn't even be able to see the field let alone make use of a jag like Ian Thomas.

 

So what. JaMarcuss Russell and Trey Lance both had cannons for arms and could have made that pass as good if not better than Darnold but I certainly wouldn't want them here just because of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, cranky said:

So what. JaMarcuss Russell and Trey Lance both had cannons for arms and could have made that pass as good if not better than Darnold but I certainly wouldn't want them here just because of that.

Russell and Lance didn't get nearly as many chances and excuses with the team that drafted them. 34 games and still arguing it's up in the air is just crazy talk let's be real.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, frankw said:

Russell and Lance didn't get nearly as many chances and excuses with the team that drafted them. 34 games and still arguing it's up in the air is just crazy talk let's be real.

Just pointing out that it's not all about arm strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cranky said:

Just pointing out that it's not all about arm strength.

No it is not but without that you need to be incredibly savvy from the pocket and have a high football IQ and the ability to diagnose and react on the fly. That was supposed to be Bryce Young. And he has neither of those qualities.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy from Marshall with the Jets, Pennington I think, had a weak arm but he had some size. He lasted a few years but never did much. 
The team says ‘it’s a big man’s game” and drafts a historically small player over every single other player. He doesn’t have ‘plus” anything and has a minus arm. It will never make sense. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, strato said:

Going back to the op, I sort of stopped at the anger mention.

If Bryce Young were a down draft flyer like he should have been, there wouldn’t be any anger because they wouldn’t keep shoving bad QB play down our throats in that situation. He’d just be gone and replaced by the next guy. No big deal. He would merely be a footnote in team history. 
 

We are not mad at him per se, we are for sure sick of watching him play quarterback for the team. And we get mad at the turnovers and subpar performance. That happens with every crappy QB and it comes with the territory. 
 

The only thing that gets you grace when you are stinking it up, is a track record of previous success. He has not earned any grace really, because he only has like one really good game in the bank. In 2 1/3 seasons and is showing no improvement this year. Just the same issues again. 

 

 

I think it’s made it difficult to move on when the entire operation has been dysfunctional.  And that has resulted in amplified resentment towards Bryce as the QB.  If he doesn’t improve significantly we need to move on but let’s base it on performance not the “I like my QB big and strong” argument which some can’t get past

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NAS said:

I think it’s made it difficult to move on when the entire operation has been dysfunctional.  And that has resulted in amplified resentment towards Bryce as the QB.  If he doesn’t improve significantly we need to move on but let’s base it on performance not the “I like my QB big and strong” argument which some can’t get past

he literally had 2 turnovers yesterday because he isnt "big or strong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, NAS said:

I think it’s made it difficult to move on when the entire operation has been dysfunctional.  And that has resulted in amplified resentment towards Bryce as the QB.  If he doesn’t improve significantly we need to move on but let’s base it on performance not the “I like my QB big and strong” argument which some can’t get past

You are dumbing down that big and strong thing though. We are all well aware, you me and everyone else, that prototypical physical traits do not guarantee anything. 

Lack of them is a much better indicator. You are lost without the physical tools. I don’t understand why people stood on the table for inferior attributes that screamed long odds and thin margins. 
 

if we translate this to OL for instance, you aren’t drafting a 235 pound guard. You just aren’t. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Russell and Lance didn't get nearly as many chances and excuses with the team that drafted them. 34 games and still arguing it's up in the air is just crazy talk let's be real.

I still think Lance would be a good one to bring in this offseason.  Learned behind some good offensive coaches, has sat for a while now, has all you need physically, and has looked decent in the preseason and very limited snaps so far.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, strato said:

You are dumbing down that big and strong thing though. We are all well aware, you me and everyone else, that prototypical physical traits do not guarantee anything. 

Lack of them is a much better indicator. You are lost without the physical tools. I don’t understand why people stood on the table for inferior attributes that screamed long odds and thin margins. 
 

if we translate this to OL for instance, you aren’t drafting a 235 pound guard. You just aren’t. 

I have seen Young make some incredible throws that suggest arm strength isn’t an issue, on the run, going to his left etc.  however his height is an issue with pressure in his face

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

The guy from Marshall with the Jets, Pennington I think, had a weak arm but he had some size. He lasted a few years but never did much. 
The team says ‘it’s a big man’s game” and drafts a historically small player over every single other player. He doesn’t have ‘plus” anything and has a minus arm. It will never make sense. 

He had a big arm before he hurt his shoulder.  Noodle arm Pennington was out of the league pretty quick.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...