Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Week 5 -Other Games


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, carpanfan96 said:

So many fans look at sacks only. Had over 70 tackles 8.5 sacks, 17 tfl, 23% win rate and like 66 pressures with 32 being quick pressures last year. 🤦‍♂️

 

My lord

The only games I watched he did very, very little. I think in 3 or 4 NFC East games I saw he had 1 sack and a handful of pressures for what felt like a fortune. I'm pretty sure he ran right by a QB like he used to do for us, heh.

I didn't just look at sacks, I watched games. I forgot he was even on the Giants at one point until someone here said something in a game day thread, lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Idk why man…  I’ve just always felt he had the tools, but he gets really hot and he also gets really cold, and he could never stay healthy.  I feel like as long as he can stay healthy, in the rhythm he is in, he might be able to sustain it.  

He definitely has the tools, he's similar to Darnold. He can look good in spurts but ultimately you just know he's gonna break your heart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I fully expect the wheels to fall off the Daniel Jones wagon any day now. I absolutely do not think he's legit.

Colts are doing a really good job around him and playing to his strengths really well. They've got a nice system built to take advantage of his play and hide some of his issues. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, carpanfan96 said:

This season in 6 games he has

7 sacks

Near 30 pressures

3 PD

30 tackles

Burns?

yeah, I used to always say it when he was here - he may have the most missed sacks I have ever seen from any single player my entire life.  If he had converted even half of the sack attempts where he had his hands on the QB and the QB broke loose from it each year, he would’ve averaged a minimum of 15 sacks a year.  I know, every pass rusher would be a X amount of sacks a year if they converted every attempt, but Burns near misses were astronomical.  If he is converting more of them with the Giants, it would not surprise me one bit for him to have a 20 sack year at some point.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Burns?

yeah, I used to always say it when he was here - he may have the most missed sacks I have ever seen from any single player my entire life.  If he had converted even half of the sack attempts where he had his hands on the QB and the QB broke loose from it each year, he would’ve averaged a minimum of 15 sacks a year.  I know, every pass rusher would be a X amount of sacks a year if they converted every attempt, but Burns near misses were astronomical.  If he is converting more of them with the Giants, it would not surprise me one bit for him to have a 20 sack year at some point.

This is exactly my take. I've never seen someone so almost incredibly impressive. He had so many narrow misses. Maybe he's put it all together... I just wasn't sure he deserved that contract at first.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Burns?

yeah, I used to always say it when he was here - he may have the most missed sacks I have ever seen from any single player my entire life.  If he had converted even half of the sack attempts where he had his hands on the QB and the QB broke loose from it each year, he would’ve averaged a minimum of 15 sacks a year.  I know, every pass rusher would be a X amount of sacks a year if they converted every attempt, but Burns near misses were astronomical.  If he is converting more of them with the Giants, it would not surprise me one bit for him to have a 20 sack year at some point.

Dude would fly by the QB in an absolute blur at 90mph at least 3-4 times every game. I used to call him a bottle rocket. He was fast as hell but once his course was plotted there was no adjustment. I used to always say if he'd slow down just a hair he'd be way more effective. He's just flying so fast that he can't adjust and he's just flat out missing sacks he should be making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...