Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adam Thielen on Young


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't think it can be underestimated how much that both Bryce and AT relied on that connection. 

They elevated each others play. Frankly, we haven't had anyone AS capable of filling that void. 

Not to say in the end we won't be better off because all these potentially future core players like TMac, Coker, Horn, etc are getting more reps and accelerating those learning curves.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

No, he did want to go back to Minny. That was a real thing. Given the newer resources we had, it was the overall correct decision to trade him away. It definitely didn't make us a better team in the short term but it may yet make us a better team in the long term. 

It was always going to suck to lose him but it was the correct decision to make for him and us.

Idk. I do believe we have 1 more win in the first few games if AT was here. That does matter. Renfrow was put in the AT role, and him and Young had no connection early on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PadresPanthersFan said:

This is the kind of trade that worked out for everyone.  We opened up a spot for our young wr to get reps for a guy who will retire at the end of the year and got solid draft pick compensation.  Thielen also got to go home. The only one it didn't work for was the vikings 

It worked for the Vikes, they are gonna turn a huge profit this year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

No, he did want to go back to Minny. That was a real thing. Given the newer resources we had, it was the overall correct decision to trade him away. It definitely didn't make us a better team in the short term but it may yet make us a better team in the long term. 

It was always going to suck to lose him but it was the correct decision to make for him and us.

Short term is the key point. Those first two games without him where pretty bad. They still aren't back to where they were offensively but they are getting better. Hopefully Tet continues to improve and Coker eventually returns - and stays healthy.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, cranky said:

Short term is the key point. Those first two games without him where pretty bad. They still aren't back to where they were offensively but they are getting better. Hopefully Tet continues to improve and Coker eventually returns - and stays healthy.

we have been bad offensively basically every game Rico Dowdle hasn't gone full Tecmo Bowl Bo Jackson on folks.  

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, cranky said:

Short term is the key point. Those first two games without him where pretty bad. They still aren't back to where they were offensively but they are getting better. Hopefully Tet continues to improve and Coker eventually returns - and stays healthy.

Tbf were not going to the superbowl this year so the development of our young wr is invaluable 

As a side note 5 of our wr are in their 2nd year or less ( t Mac, Coker, tremayne, horn, x) 

It's def a promising youth movement

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Idk. I do believe we have 1 more win in the first few games if AT was here. That does matter. Renfrow was put in the AT role, and him and Young had no connection early on.

I mean, look, we aren't likely to be a playoff team nor a contending team. Could he have netted us another win? Maybe. 

It's not a big deal. We need to build for the future and that is the path we seem to be on. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

I tried to tell everybody it was a mistake, but we had to do AT a "solid". Bullshit

I thought so at the time as well. Of course if the rookies/Legette keep developing than maybe not. At least they got a fourth and fifth round draft pick out of it and the saved 7 million as the Vikings picked up his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've already posted this but I think it's worth repeating here: "To me, that's an insult to Horn but that's besides the point. Against the Dolphins, the Panthers faced a 4-5 with 3:31 left in the game. Bryce hit Horn for a 17 yrd completion picking up the 4th down and leading to a score for the win." So what was wrong with using Horn on that down given they had done it before - with success? It just seems to me people are trying to belittle Horn just to make Young look bad. I can understand you not liking Young, and don't have a problem with it, but I'm not sure I can understand insulting another player just to make something fit your narrative. 
    • each of the past 3 yeara byoungs y/g passer rating and qbr all have been between 30th and 24th.  up and down he hasnt improved he had the atlanta game thus year and a few ok games but didnt even eclipse 300 yards but 2 games and one of those 2 againdt arizona he got 300 bc he was trying to come back from a blowout he caused by playinf horrific.  i just dont see what everyome else sees maybe i am the one with the issue bc i cant see his greatness.  i woild rather an udfa rookie next year at qb
×
×
  • Create New...