Speaking of revisiting trades: Brian Burns

[Basbear]

45 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

You can look at the article and the pff stats and clearly see that he gets more attention than anyone else on that line.

PFF you say...... Brother Dexter Lawrence is the biggest problem on that stacked DL, he gets tripled teamed on plays. 

They ALL are ballin, nice for BBs breakout in year 7...

Edited 2 hours ago by Basbear

[strato]

2 hours ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

David and Nicole Tepper were responsible for Bryce Young.  That's just undisputable fact.

I don’t dispute that but there also word about Fitterer from the year before at an event maybe the Supuer Bowl don’t remember. 
 Kw I won’t rule out that he was just kissing Tepper’s ass with the Bryce support. It is all so weird and hard to understand. I mean how anyone could think he was worth that trade and the 1st overall, was something I couldn’t understand.  

[Cpt slay a ho]

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

But if you're planning to make a move for a QB in the future, and we were, those picks would have been huge trade capital. Now ask yourself how much better situation would we have been in if we had been able to exchange the Rams 1sts instead of our own and DJ Moore? 

Would we still have ended up with the number 1 overall? Possibly. 

Would we have kept Darnold since he was showing improvement and see if he improved, then had 4 1sts in 2 years to get our QB. Its possible. 

We could have also used those 4 1sts to build around Bryce and our defense. 

We could have done a lot. It wasn't just about Burns. It was admitting we weren't just a single piece away. Burns gave us 3 high value pieces to build from in trade value if played correctly. For a GM with any vision for the future, that's a grand slam and you're signing that trade before they can reconsider. 

I stated initially he should have been traded for the rams deal but once we didn’t take it, they should have extended him, we gave all the leverage up once that trade proposal leaked