Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speaking of revisiting trades: Brian Burns


Peon Awesome
 Share

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

You can look at the article and the pff stats and clearly see that he gets more attention than anyone else on that line. 🤦‍♂️

PFF you say...... Brother Dexter Lawrence is the biggest problem on that stacked DL, he gets tripled teamed on plays. 

They ALL are ballin, nice for BBs breakout in year 7...

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

David and Nicole Tepper were responsible for Bryce Young.  That's just undisputable fact.

I don’t dispute that but there also word about Fitterer from the year before at an event maybe the Supuer Bowl don’t remember. 
 Kw I won’t rule out that he was just kissing Tepper’s ass with the Bryce support. It is all so weird and hard to understand. I mean how anyone could think he was worth that trade and the 1st overall, was something I couldn’t understand.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

But if you're planning to make a move for a QB in the future, and we were, those picks would have been huge trade capital. Now ask yourself how much better situation would we have been in if we had been able to exchange the Rams 1sts instead of our own and DJ Moore? 

Would we still have ended up with the number 1 overall? Possibly. 

Would we have kept Darnold since he was showing improvement and see if he improved, then had 4 1sts in 2 years to get our QB. Its possible. 

We could have also used those 4 1sts to build around Bryce and our defense. 

We could have done a lot. It wasn't just about Burns. It was admitting we weren't just a single piece away. Burns gave us 3 high value pieces to build from in trade value if played correctly. For a GM with any vision for the future, that's a grand slam and you're signing that trade before they can reconsider. 

I stated initially he should have been traded for the rams deal but once we didn’t take it, they should have extended him, we gave all the leverage up once that trade proposal leaked 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

I don’t dispute that but there also word about Fitterer from the year before at an event maybe the Supuer Bowl don’t remember. 
 Kw I won’t rule out that he was just kissing Tepper’s ass with the Bryce support. It is all so weird and hard to understand. I mean how anyone could think he was worth that trade and the 1st overall, was something I couldn’t understand.  

I never understood how they made the trade without having a target as they stated. You know you're drafting a QB but you don't know who. If you don't know one of those is worth the 1st pick yet, how do you move up to draft any of them? What if none of them are worth the pick after the pre draft process? Then you've put yourself in a position that you can't really get away from. Just because you need a QB doesn't mean you should take one of the options available. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I never understood how they made the trade without having a target as they stated. You know you're drafting a QB but you don't know who. If you don't know one of those is worth the 1st pick yet, how do you move up to draft any of them? What if none of them are worth the pick after the pre draft process? Then you've put yourself in a position that you can't really get away from. Just because you need a QB doesn't mean you should take one of the options available. 

My only conclusion about that is they either thought both were worthy or Bryce was worthy. 
Frank’s reaction hints that - if they were straight with him - they thought either would do. 
 

My opinion was that neither was worth doing that trade but that was before I even ‘scouted’ them I am just against that type of move regardless  A firm policy  

If you can trade for the pick, it likely isn’t a generational player in the first place, because people don’t trade those. Get a clue David Tepper  

It was such a clusterfug.

 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, strato said:

My only conclusion about that is they either thought both were worthy or Bruce was worthy. 
Frank’s reaction hints that - if they were straight with him - they thought either would do. 
 

My opinion was that neither was worth doing that fake but that was before I even ‘scouted’ them I am just against that type of move regardless  A firm policy  

If you can trade for the pick, it likely isn’t a generational player in the first place, because people don’t trade those. Get a clue David Tepper  

It was such a clusterfug.

 

My thought too. Chicago needs a QB. Why in the hell are they trading away that pick unless they think it's going to net them a better pick in the next year's draft if hy didn't believe in these guys. But they also selected Caleb Williams so I don't know that they cam really judge QBs either, but it still seems like they got the better end of the trade then. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just another example of the huddle not knowing talent when they see it . Dude was a beast here and only getting better . Still got people double downing on their “opinions” of him not being for the sake of them never being wrong lol . Been killing it this year and yes we need him or a player like him . You don’t let those type of edge rushers go esp for a weak ahh 2nd rd pick smh 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, VintagePanther said:

Just another example of the huddle not knowing talent when they see it . Dude was a beast here and only getting better . Still got people double downing on their “opinions” of him not being for the sake of them never being wrong lol . Been killing it this year and yes we need him or a player like him . You don’t let those type of edge rushers go esp for a weak ahh 2nd rd pick smh 

Wtf are you even talking about? We only traded him because we hadn't been able to work out a contract because we had lost any leverage in negotiations after rejecting a trade offer for a player equivalent to prime Khalil Mack. He was not producing as a top tier game changing edge rusher like Mack. He was producing like Hasaan Reddick. He deserved to be paid like Reddick, not Mack. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

My thought too. Chicago needs a QB. Why in the hell are they trading away that pick unless they think it's going to net them a better pick in the next year's draft if hy didn't believe in these guys. But they also selected Caleb Williams so I don't know that they cam really judge QBs either, but it still seems like they got the better end of the trade then. 

Bears didn’t have much more luck on the pick, but they came out ahead by netting assets from moving it out a year.

They couldn’t keep pushing it out every year though.  I mean you could in theory.  But no GM is getting that level of patience while the team is struggling.

Eventually you have to pick a guy.  And odds are that guy is gonna be a complete bust or just mediocre (still a bust).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Bears didn’t have much more luck on the pick, but they came out ahead by netting assets from moving it out a year.

They couldn’t keep pushing it out every year though.  I mean you could in theory.  But no GM is getting that level of patience while the team is struggling.

Eventually you have to pick a guy.  And odds are that guy is gonna be a complete bust or just mediocre (still a bust).

They scored huge off of us. But when it came to QB they screwed themselves just like we did. Except they had a few more of our picks to wipe their tears with. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Bears didn’t have much more luck on the pick, but they came out ahead by netting assets from moving it out a year.

They couldn’t keep pushing it out every year though.  I mean you could in theory.  But no GM is getting that level of patience while the team is struggling.

Eventually you have to pick a guy.  And odds are that guy is gonna be a complete bust or just mediocre (still a bust).

They did but only because they picked Williams. I remember a lot of us pre draft felt Daniels was the better of the two and there were some big flags with Williams that may make him fools gold. But Chicago is the place QBs go to watch their careers die or never really be born, so there is that curse too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • fuging awesome win all around, loved nearly everything I saw. Of course the Nets suck and we’ve won our opener like 10 straight season lol so it doesn’t mean much but better than losing or having certain young players look terrible.   Hopefully we can stay healthy can keep building.   Also, for at least a couple days, all 3 Carolina pro sports teams have winning records… When was the last time that happened? I think last time both Charlotte teams had winning records was 2018 but Canes I think were below .500 then
    • Me either. I actually thinks it's the worst thing that could have happened. The last thing we need right now is Bryce out for any length of time. We need him to play for the FO to decide, correctly or not, if he is the future of this team. 
    • The game thread is stream of consciousness. I may or may not have made a tasteless remark I don’t recall.    I know that my reaction was mixed, , not sure if I thought it was a positive or a negative in terms of.the game.    What I do know is we don’t need him hurt in the middle of a year where the jury is looking to come in on his future. fug that we need him playing and healthy so it is a fair game evaluation wise.    That is absolutely the most important thing in my mind by a large margin. I am not happy he is hurt, at all. 
×
×
  • Create New...