Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Bryce Young


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Has anybody else seen this?

Same vein as Captain Andrew Luck, not sure if it's by the same guy though (don't think so)

Either way, and whatever your feelings on Bryce - love him or hate him - this page is amusing 😄

Yep, I've been enjoying these for a while . It reminds me of Matthew Broderick's character in the movie "Glory" who would write in his journals to his Mother about life during the war. (It makes more sense than many post here).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's weak sauce.

Here, let me take a crack...

Dearest mother,

Many doubted our cause and honestly so did I but fortunately Sgt. Dowdle led multiple devastating bayonet charges due to lack ammunition for our guns through the air leaving us with few other options on offense. Our defensive efforts were noteworthy and the efforts were bolstered by the enemy having a cannon blow up in their faces and generally falling into disarray every time they threatened our breastworks. I have hope for our upcoming winter campaign though I know I must be more be more cautious with my decisions and allow the troops to carry me. I don't have to win the battle, I must just be mindful of not losing the war.

- lil Brycey poo

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's enjoy it for what it is. And that first post was hilarious.

We somehow keep winning games in the least expected ways. This is getting to be a scrappy team that no one should want to see coming up on their schedule.

This probably won't be our big year, but you'd have to be a big cynic not to think something good was building... finally.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Let's enjoy it for what it is. And that first post was hilarious.

We somehow keep winning games in the least expected ways. This is getting to be a scrappy team that no one should want to see coming up on their schedule.

This probably won't be our big year, but you'd have to be a big cynic not to think something good was building... finally.

I'm okay with being confused by winning 😐

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Let's enjoy it for what it is. And that first post was hilarious.

We somehow keep winning games in the least expected ways. This is getting to be a scrappy team that no one should want to see coming up on their schedule.

This probably won't be our big year, but you'd have to be a big cynic not to think something good was building... finally.

It's also nice to see it be on the backs of a what appears to be a decent core of young players. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's weak sauce.

Here, let me take a crack...

Dearest mother,

Many doubted our cause and honestly so did I but fortunately Sgt. Dowdle led multiple devastating bayonet charges due to lack ammunition for our guns through the air leaving us with few other options on offense. Our defensive efforts were noteworthy and the efforts were bolstered by the enemy having a cannon blow up in their faces and generally falling into disarray every time they threatened our breastworks. I have hope for our upcoming winter campaign though I know I must be more be more cautious with my decisions and allow the troops to carry me. I don't have to win the battle, I must just be mindful of not losing the war.

- lil Brycey poo

Lol, that was funny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BPA comes with the caveat of positional value and roster need included. Never let the latter two completely overwhelm the first, however. Our FO seems to lean heavily into "WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POTENTIALZ!!!" as a fourth category and often it seems as the #1 overall pursuit. With as many needs as this roster has, I am not going to get upset over a real roster upgrade at WR versus some reach at EDGE or whatever other extreme needs we have. Overall, I want to see the roster get better. There is far, far, FAR more than one offseason of work left to get this roster into the top 10-12 in the NFL. That should be the goal. 
    • I would say we are more likely to get smoked by Tampa, blast Seattle and then perplexingly lose to Tampa again. 
    • In general, Dave Canales tends to target his TE's the least frequently of any position group(WR/RB/TE) during his three years of running an NFL offense.  However, if you notice this percentage has crept up over time. 2025 is the first year that TE has eclipsed RB in target percentage. Production has also gone up in 2025. This is a percentage of total output in each category. Canales has always used a very TE heavy offense. In fact, on average his offensive formations are 2 or 3 TE sets roughly 80% of all offensive formations. So, the question may be, with this uptick in total TE output, could an elite or top tier TE make a significant impact? I believe there is some evidence this may be the case. Here are a look at TE snaps and Cade Otten specifically. These are the snap percentages for all rostered TE's in every Dave Canales offense. The bolded cell is Cade Otten's whopping 96.46% of total snap counts in the single year he was in the Dave Canales offense in Tampa. This was overwhelmingly his career high. His production was higher with less utilization in 2024, however.    In conclusion, while I don't anticipate ever seeing a top 5 producing/Pro Bowl caliber TE performance in a Dave Canales offense, there does appear to be some evidence that an actual upgrade in our TE room would actually lead to increasing overall offensive efficiency. I think Otten's utilization rate does indicate that the splitting of time between our relatively even TE group would cede significant snaps if a far superior option were available. I believe this is an area we could(and should have this past offseason/draft) made a more concerted effort to get a dynamic TE threat, after the apparent failure that J. Sanders appears to have been.  
×
×
  • Create New...