Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

J Person article on Canales and game plan and Rico

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

HPPantherzfan Mentor

HPPantherzfan

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Waiting for Dave to run the ball 55 times right up the middle with the box loaded and then be at the press conference like “see it didn’t work”

You have to be able to pass the ball so everyone isn’t at the line of scrimmage.  I don’t know that I believe in DC but I believe he has a plan to expose BY once and forever 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, ncbob said:

I’m trying to figure out if he is a solid OC, his game plan and play calling suck, that’s what a good OC is supposed implement week in and week out. I’m just not seeing it. 

Functional is solid but it's not going to wow you. Looks at GB vs SF. That's the honest range IMO. Solid is still better than we have seen recently but it's still not good regardless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ProcessBlue2 Grand Master

ProcessBlue2

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, HPPantherzfan said:

You have to be able to pass the ball so everyone isn’t at the line of scrimmage.  I don’t know that I believe in DC but I believe he has a plan to expose BY once and forever 

I was just being sarcastic so Dave can blame the run game for not working. I think so too, if and when we are eliminated from the playoffs we will probably see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sir Big Spurr Experienced

Sir Big Spurr

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Jmac said:

With Young and Canales, this team has both arms tied behind their back. Hard to win when the two most important parts of a football team fail. A running team getting 4.75 yards a carry that doesn't run the ball. Putting the game on a QB who is constantly inconsistent and expecting good things. 

Two most important people on the field are betas with zero leadership skills. I can’t wait until they’re both gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnstonny Grand Master

Johnstonny

Posted
Posted

If you trot Brycie out there again next year or pick up his option there will be some serious dissention among the troops. Who is going to put forth effort while getting their bodies busted up only to know we really don't have a chance at winning. They know he is terrible. I only  saw 2 wins on the schedule at the beginning of the year and our record is a fluke. I'm as surprised as anybody. Trying to win with Brycie is like trying to win the Daytona 500 in a Ford Escort.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, ncbob said:

I’m trying to figure out if he is a solid OC, his game plan and play calling suck, that’s what a good OC is supposed implement week in and week out. I’m just not seeing it. 

Mediocre really. Inconsistent but has good and bad games. Not bad but also not good so mediocre. Bryce does limit his playbook but I also remember him in Tampa being the same. It why why they interviewed him I was vocal about his shortcomings which seem the same 2 years later too

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Mediocre really. Inconsistent but has good and bad games. Not bad but also not good so mediocre. Bryce does limit his playbook but I also remember him in Tampa being the same. It why why they interviewed him I was vocal about his shortcomings which seem the same 2 years later too

He is typical ball control play action take some deep shots that has been done in the league forever.  It is sound if you have the players. It isn’t innovative or exotic or flashy which attracts a lot of people.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, strato said:

He is typical ball control play action take some deep shots that has been done in the league forever.  It is sound if you have the players. It isn’t innovative or exotic or flashy which attracts a lot of people.  

He has never been consistent enough with the running which is his MO tho and that becomes the thing that trips him up the most. Since Tampa he has games where he 'can't call running plays' like on Monday. 

It should be easy to do with decent personel, especially in the cheap RB era. 

Edited by Waldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
25 minutes ago, Waldo said:

He has never been consistent enough with the running which is his MO tho and that becomes the thing that trips him up the most. Since Tampa he has games where he 'can't call running plays' like on Monday. 

It should be easy to do with decent personel, especially in the cheap RB era. 

And the concept of using two backs in the backfield seems very perplexing to him

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Waldo said:

He has never been consistent enough with the running which is his MO tho and that becomes the thing that trips him up the most. Since Tampa he has games where he 'can't call running plays' like on Monday. 

It should be easy to do with decent personel, especially in the cheap RB era. 

I was really going off of what I saw in Tampa. And with Andy a little. Can’t do that with Young.
 And yeah he is no Dan Henning/Fox with the stubborn attitude of we are run it and run it and run it some more. 
 

Is he ADHD where he forgets he is supposed to be running it? Kidding. Maybe it is the WR coaching background that overrides the commitment to running it. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, strato said:

I was really going off of what I saw in Tampa. And with Andy a little. Can’t do that with Young.
 And yeah he is no Dan Henning/Fox with the stubborn attitude of we are run it and run it and run it some more. 
 

Is he ADHD where he forgets he is supposed to be running it? Kidding. Maybe it is the WR coaching background that overrides the commitment to running it. 
 

He seems like the inverse of Ron/Fox ball. Where it should be run first but he wants to pass it instead. It lost Carroll a SB so it's that same gist as that. Functional but just like the other they tend to look to their kinks and it goes sideways at times. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

    • strato
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By strato · Posted

      Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...