Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your combine - bench press


Zod

Recommended Posts

or you prefer actual exercise like olympic lifting.

That's why you do it all. Bench press is a good lift. Our team does all kinds of stuff, bench, incline, military press, push press, power cleans, snatches, clean & snatches, deadlifts, good mornings, dumbbell exercises for a lot of different muscle groups, pullups and chinups, dips, squats, etc. Any lift by itself isn't going to be enough. Working out every area of the body with the focus on the legs is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can bench press your body weight and do pull ups, both with proper form, a combination of 30 times, you should be considered strong.

Does "proper form" include swinging your legs during pull ups? If so, I can go above and beyond your strong.

Just normal vertical pull ups, arms fully extended on each rep... maybe 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does "proper form" include swinging your legs during pull ups? If so, I can go above and beyond your strong.

Just normal vertical pull ups, arms fully extended on each rep... maybe 5.

Yes and no bouncing the bar off your chest either when doing bench.

When I'm fatter than I should be I'm around 35 but when I'm at a good weight I'm around 50

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bench is a good exercise, I get that its not king though. Its a compound exercise for some major muscle groups, its also a lift that you can put up a good amount of weight with; when you combine those with eachother its a damn good muscle growth stimulate. This is the same reason I love deadlifts and front squats. (Btw, Bulgarian split squats are hell, but a damn good workout)

Put up 245 earlier today at the end of my set, couldn't quite get a second. So I'm more positive of being close to 10 reps of 225.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and no bouncing the bar off your chest either when doing bench.

When I'm fatter than I should be I'm around 35 but when I'm at a good weight I'm around 50

This sounds like a fun test. I don't doubt I could hit 30, I want to know what I could get. Is tis just one set of each or can you come back to it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh, that's actually somewhat like my workouts. My A set is bench, my b is pull-ups. I cap the pull-ups at 10, could do more for the first few sets, the bench is over my body weight though.

I remember a blog post by Nate Greene where he accepted a timed fitness challenge from a friend that involved crunches, pull ups, push ups, and dips I think. If I weren't posting from my phone id try to get the link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...