Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN guys talk Bryce fifth year option


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

We're kind of stuck in the situation.  I would brace yourselves for a Cardinals/Jags type path the next few seasons.

We're not stuck.

Stuck is when the guy shows just enough to keep faith with him.

We're way beyond that point. Move. On. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean, I don't think there is much chance of a "competition" anyway.

He is either gonna be the guy or they are gonna move on from him.

That's what I was referencing in the comment about John Fox. 

Not a single one of us believed that Rodney Peete actually beat out anyone in a true competition. It was all just bullsh-t lip service from John Fox. Week 1 proved it... definitively.

Mind you, I don't think Canales would necessarily go that route. He'd likely just say "Bryce is the starter" and leave it at that.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's what I was referencing in the comment about John Fox. 

Not a single one of us believed that Rodney Peete actually beat out anyone in a true competition. It was all just bullsh-t lip service from John Fox. Week 1 proved it... definitively.

Mind you, I don't think Canales would necessarily go that route. He'd likely just say "Bryce is the starter" and leave it at that.

He has been that guy the whole time, TBH.

Proved it several times previously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OldhamA said:

We're not stuck.

Stuck is when the guy shows just enough to keep faith with him.

We're way beyond that point. Move. On. 

I'm saying the team won't, even if some may think moving on should be done.  Which results in a similar 2026.  And depending on how that goes, we could end up in that type of spot.  

I just don't see us moving on unless he completely falls out to finish the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man…tough question….look at patriots with Drake Maye…do we hang on to Bryce and hope he becomes that?   Naw people…he won’t become Drake Maye ever.  I love my Panthers and want them to win a Championship….i just don5 think we will get there with Bryce at QB….keep searching till you get the QB that will get us there. Unless he pulls off some heroics in the playoffs…given he plays well enough to get us there…no to the 5th year and no extension.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe in giving rookies QBs and HCs three years unless the wheels really fall off, like Reich. 
Canales is on year 2. Bryce is on year 3. 
Yeah, he may have shown some improvement, very minor improvement, but he still hasn’t proven he is the long term options, which was what I was worried about last offseason.
We have literally seen everything Bryce can offer. The ceiling has been reached. Bryce isn’t gonna magically become something else. 
Next year will be the same thing. Limited offense due to Bryce’s limits. We’ll lose games because of it and win games in spite of it. 
Panthers need to move on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I believe in giving rookies QBs and HCs three years unless the wheels really fall off, like Reich. 
Canales is on year 2. Bryce is on year 3. 
Yeah, he may have shown some improvement, very minor improvement, but he still hasn’t proven he is the long term options, which was what I was worried about last offseason.
We have literally seen everything Bryce can offer. The ceiling has been reached. Bryce isn’t gonna magically become something else. 
Next year will be the same thing. Limited offense due to Bryce’s limits. We’ll lose games because of it and win games in spite of it. 
Panthers need to move on. 

We have also spent damn near every available resource we have to help him succeed and this is the result. It's not sustainable to keep a 100m offensive line and spend top picks over and over on offensive players, and RB contracts. When some of those pieces start falling away, we'll start seeing regression. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

We have also spent damn near every available resource we have to help him succeed and this is the result. It's not sustainable to keep a 100m offensive line and spend top picks over and over on offensive players, and RB contracts. When some of those pieces start falling away, we'll start seeing regression. 

This is what people are not realizing with giving this dwarf QB a franchise deal.  When teams shell out that kind of cash for a QB you can't spend 150+milllion dollar line to protect his physical short comings.  

Tepper is a moron when it comes to football apparently as we all can see by this point. I believe DM will unfortunately and stupidly pick up his 5th yr option. Season with BY will be a rinse and repeat cycle consisting of below average QB play through and through. 

Anyone who doesn't believe BY is not a below average QB in the NFL at this point literally knows nothing about football as a sport.  Dude is not fooling me, he's shown me enough.

For people clamoring for Sam Howell please just STFU already.  You are obviously just UNC nut huggers because if you think BY turnover problems are bad Howells were even worse. He also looks like he has a serious learning disability and a smile only mother could love......

                                               1950461380_sam2.jpg.a59b324d0383f118d828af00d0945ec9.jpg

                                               sam.jpg.7b786b042503ebd4ff29514a4108a66c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

I'm saying the team won't, even if some may think moving on should be done.  Which results in a similar 2026.  And depending on how that goes, we could end up in that type of spot.  

I just don't see us moving on unless he completely falls out to finish the year.

I'd agree 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2025 at 1:58 PM, Jon Snow said:

I'm not buying they are all in on Young. If they are we have bigger problems than a short qb.

I wouldn't necessarily say they're "all in" but I do think they're "in" 😕

(now I'm gonna sit back and watch to see who takes that line and makes it sound icky) 😒

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't necessarily say they're "all in" but I do think they're "in" 😕

(now I'm gonna sit back and watch to see who takes that line and makes it sound icky) 😒

I think they are hoping. Mainly because they have put themselves in a position to where they are kinda stuck. They've waited a year or 2 too late to hedge their bet. Now they are left with hoping the massive investment the made eventually nets them a decent qb. I am still amazed that these professionals haven't seen the need for a plan B in the qb room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...