Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Case for(or Against) Drafting/Signing a TE


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

No, and that was an issue we hadwith Rivera. We used to joke about making a list of all of the things Rivera learned too late. 

I'm still cautiously optimistic about Canales at the moment, but we'll see.

I am very pessimistic. I genuinely view him as a bigger problem than Bryce and that is saying a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our TE group is young but they are comically either the highest of highs or the lowest of lows. Can't chalk all of it up to just lack of talent or busts. Whether it's Canales or Bryce Young or a combination of the two you don't just week to week month to month go from looking like you've got future studs at TE to complete duds. At some point your QB has to elevate these guys instead of them always saving his ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Our TE group is young but they are comically either the highest of highs or the lowest of lows. Can't chalk all of it up to just lack of talent or busts. Whether it's Canales or Bryce Young or a combination of the two you don't just week to week month to month go from looking like you've got future studs at TE to complete duds. At some point your QB has to elevate these guys instead of them always saving his ass.

Lmao just yapping at this point 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Wasn't there a thread a few weeks back saying from one of the beat reporters. Our offseason targets are to get better at TE, Pass rushing and Inside LB 

I don't remember it specifically. I would imagine any "insider info" that far out is a little vague. More along the lines of ths rather obvious things we can see.

Hopefully the FO has a good idea of their attack plan as soon as the offseason cycle starts in a few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This front office screwed the pooch again in the '25 draft.  Tyler Warren was sitting there and would've been the perfect addition for a QB who can't push the ball down field and could've greatly used an intermediate route security blanket.

I don't even entertain this team getting a draft pick or free agent correct at this point.  Their drafts suck, and no decent free agent wants to live in Charlotte in their 20's, unless you wildly overpay for them.

We are stuck hoping our division continues to suck, and 8 or 9 wins every year is competitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

This front office screwed the pooch again in the '25 draft.  Tyler Warren was sitting there and would've been the perfect addition for a QB who can't push the ball down field and could've greatly used an intermediate route security blanket.

I don't even entertain this team getting a draft pick or free agent correct at this point.  Their drafts suck, and no decent free agent wants to live in Charlotte in their 20's, unless you wildly overpay for them.

We are stuck hoping our division continues to suck, and 8 or 9 wins every year is competitive.

TMac is a considerably better pick than Warren given positional value and given that TMac has been a OROY candidate and sometimes favorite.

I am more annoyed that we KEPT passing on TE's in the deepest TR draft in arguably the last decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

TMac is a considerably better pick than Warren given positional value and given that TMac has been a OROY candidate and sometimes favorite.

I am more annoyed that we KEPT passing on TE's in the deepest TR draft in arguably the last decade.

TMac is a good player and would've been the right pick if our QB could throw a ball farther than 40 yards.

For this team's current build (run first, game management passing attack) and the fact that our TE's are laughably bad - the five on our roster have combined for less than 600 yards total, with 3 TDs - Warren should've been the pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

TMac is a good player and would've been the right pick if our QB could throw a ball farther than 40 yards.

For this team's current build (run first, game management passing attack) and the fact that our TE's are laughably bad - the five on our roster have combined for less than 600 yards total, with 3 TDs - Warren should've been the pick. 

I think you should see the OP for pretty big reasons why that is a completely incorrect take given this is a Dave Canales team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think you should see the OP for pretty big reasons why that is a completely incorrect take given this is a Dave Canales team.

I agree the coach should be replaced.  That's my whole point, he has zero clue how to maximize what his players / team are capable of executing, and putting pieces in place to help them accomplish those things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

I agree the coach should be replaced.  That's my whole point, he has zero clue how to maximize what his players / team are capable of executing, and putting pieces in place to help them accomplish those things. 

Yes but that wouldn't result in a better player on our team. I don't disagree(although I completely disagree on Warren vs. TMac).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After some of the calls last year probably won't see much of a drop off 
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48344034/nfl-begin-hiring-replacement-officials-given-state-negotiations-nfl-referees-association   Honestly fug these refs and their union. Resisting changes that would actually incentivize good performance and not seniority based systems. What a bunch of donkeys. Hope the replacements straight up take their jobs and never give them back. Sick of watching refs script games with no repercussions.
    • Donovan seems like highest risk to me. Lloyd and May have already established relationships with all these kids. There’s probably guys hitting the portal that they recruited from HS. And then there’s the possibility of transferring their own guys from their current teams. They’ve also been recruiting the HS kids for like the next 5 years already. Look at the Iowa coach who hit the ground running by transferring all his guys from his D2 program. Or going across sports to Cignetti transferring all his JMU guys year one then building off that to a national title year 2. Donovan is starting from square one having been in the NBA so long and he’s already 60. So you’re potentially punting year 1 for a guy you are just hoping to be a 10 year hire while you figure out how to actually develop your next home grown 20yr guy. That’s 1/10th of the time you have him, more or less at best. The hope would be that he would find some high level assistants who have been working the college recruiting trails already, but then are you giving up his ideal staff just to get a foothold in recruiting and transfers. Think Belichick year one was bad? Imagine how much worse it would be without Steve Belichicks transfer portal pulls. Hoping Mays or Lloyd are all they’re cracked up to be.
×
×
  • Create New...