Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young is the worst QB in Panthers History


dep
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Bryce’s ceiling is replacement level.  I don’t know why it’s so hard for some to see.

Yeah but if we just get him an OL, RBs, more WRs, TEs and a defense, he can be really good, just give him another year. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, strato said:

Chicken or the egg. The assignment is, MAKE them respect you and make them defend the whole field. 
They are telling you they don’t think you can do that. You have to force them to change. 
Our offense with Young is unable to do that. Just the way it is. Unless/until the passing game can extract payment, it will stay that way. 

Yes Young and most QBs need more than 19 rushing yards. Last week he poo the bed, this week our running game poo the bed. We have a lot of work as a team as a whole to work on. Can you point me to an average QB who won by playing better than Young did today while his team ran for under 20 yards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Yes Young and most QBs need more than 19 rushing yards. Last week he poo the bed, this week our running game poo the bed. We have a lot of work as a team as a whole to work on. Can you point me to an average QB who won by playing better than Young did today while his team ran for under 20 yards?

This is simple. You get get more rushing yards by threatening people with passing the ball. 
If a team is so good that you can’t pass either, tip your hat.  Bryce be tipping that hat an awful lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, acwimby24 said:

My mistake. I assumed that defenses wouldn’t respect the deep passing game enough to commit significant resources to defending against it. 

Yeah if you can play 2 high and shut down our running game we are going to struggle. Saints did that both times. We don’t have the talent to adjust to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, strato said:

This is simple. You get get more rushing yards by threatening people with passing the ball. 
If a team is so good that you can’t pass either, tip your hat.  Bryce be tipping that hat an awful lot. 

Yeah our passing offense put up 250 yards and 2 TDs with absolutely no help from the running game. To me they did their part. There were a couple 3rd down drops as well which could fall on the QB but again this isn’t really the game to throw him under the bus. Last week was one 1000%. Bryce did enough to beat Tampa just like last time today. If we want to be elite defenses like Seattle then yeah we need to reevaluate our QB, play calling, OL, and weapons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, I can give you a tip.  Trying to run with Mr Scot’s whack bologna ways ain’t the way bruh.  But you seem to be pretty invested given you keep stealing him lines as yours lol. 
 

 
 

 

Funny that you would mention Mr. Scot. Are you the one that banned him for no reason?

Is that why you’re giving him a tip? 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah our passing offense put up 250 yards and 2 TDs with absolutely no help from the running game. To me they did their part. There were a couple 3rd down drops as well which could fall on the QB but again this isn’t really the game to throw him under the bus. Last week was one 1000%. Bryce did enough to beat Tampa just like last time today. If we want to be elite defenses like Seattle then yeah we need to reevaluate our QB, play calling, OL, and weapons. 

I am not going on one game. It isn’t this *one*. We are at the end of the third season of trying to make this guy a viable cornerstone moving forward. I say it has failed.

Have I been rooting for it to fail? Somewhat. Because I had no belief from the jump. But was forced to accept three years as an evaluation period. And there isn’t enough there, still, to turn me around. Sorry. 

Could I have been transformed into a supporter? It would take actual really good results. What we were presented with fell short. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, strato said:

I am not going on one game. It isn’t this *one*. We are at the end of the third season of trying to make this guy a viable cornerstone moving forward. I say it has failed.

Have I been rooting for it to fail? Somewhat. Because I had no belief from the jump. But was forced to accept three years as an evaluation period. And there isn’t enough there, still, to turn me around. Sorry. 

Could I have been transformed into a supporter? It would take actual really good results. What we were presented with fell short. 

Yeah him not being the guy is a logical stance to take in a debate. I have no problem with that. Blaming him for this loss immediately when he was the lesser of many other issues is all I was debating. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

He had an 8 figure reason not to.

Hmm. poo coach, doesn't want to do his job because he didn't get his way, not enough balls to stand up for himself, refuses to try.

Huddle: Bryce Young's fault

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah him not being the guy is a logical stance to take in a debate. I have no problem with that. Blaming him for this loss immediately when he was the lesser of many other issues is all I was debating. 

I think there is a lot of stuff blended into the reaction. The game itself and what it meant, surely. 
For me, it is the closure of third year of this ill fated experiment trying to prove a historically inferior player profile could defy the odds. 
I never believed it could. It hasn’t, so far.

How fuging far are we expected to take this? 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...