Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Someone's not gonna be happy


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I'm OK with picking up the 5th year option (mostly because there aren't any clear long-term better options likely to be available in the offseason) but I need to see a lot more consistency before I'd support a full-on contract extension.

Its year 3. I don’t think he will ever be consistent 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Do you want actual or potential options?

He doesn’t want either. He’s using a rhetorical device called a thought terminating cliche. An example of this would be any time someone says something like “well it doesn’t matter no one will do <thing being argued about>.”

he’s not actually interested in debate about this; he wants to nitpick specifics from a list of options that are unknown as you pointed out. Then he’ll just burden of proof you to death. The person most famous for this kind of arguing ended up exsanguinated from a hole in his neck, cucked before his body got cold.

the correct answer of course to “who specifically,” based on the past three years, is basically anyone that steps on the field.

Why speculate about who specifically the player is when we’ve seen it can be Phillip rivers, Russell Wilson, or Daniel jones.

Just get literally anyone. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Do you want actual or potential options? The CURRENT free agent list is available but that will likely change quite a bit based on what we are seeing happen already.

Who specifically would you bring in that would be better than Young. I do not need the complete list of FA's. Just tell me which available QB you would bring in that you think would upgrade the Panthers' offense next year. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro&#x27;s horse said:

He doesn’t want either. He’s using a rhetorical device called a thought terminating cliche. An example of this would be any time someone says something like “well it doesn’t matter no one will do <thing being argued about>.”

he’s not actually interested in debate about this; he wants to nitpick specifics from a list of options that are unknown as you pointed out. Then he’ll just burden of proof you to death. The person most famous for this kind of arguing ended up exsanguinated from a hole in his neck, cucked before his body got cold.

the correct answer of course to “who specifically,” based on the past three years, is basically anyone that steps on the field.

Why speculate about who specifically the player is when we’ve seen it can be Phillip rivers, Russell Wilson, or Daniel jones.

Just get literally anyone. 

Oh I am aware. He is a Forever Brycer.

He was expecting I wouldn't even reply or give a wishy washy answer.

The truth is, there will be ample options at least as good as Bryce with far, far higher ceilings and a smaller group of CLEARLY better than Bryce options available, as well.

And that's not even touching the draft.

It's a far shorter list to find QB's in the NFL that are demonstrably WORSE than Bryce. Although I do have that list available, as well.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cranky said:

Who specifically would you bring in that would be better than Young. I do not need the complete list of FA's. Just tell me which available QB you would bring in that you think would upgrade the Panthers' offense next year. 

So I get to pick, in god-like fashion whomever I want with no limits????

I am attempting to give realistic or potential options but if you just want me to start listing better QB's than Bryce, I can do that too.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like cranky just in case you’re sincere and this isn’t just some bit (laudatory if so) what you’re doing is borderline sea lioning and that’s a bad look.

if you’re unfamiliar with that term you’re basically forcing a conversation, getting defensive about being belittled, and never bringing anything worth debating to the table.

you’ve posted an opinion piece from someone who starts it off by admitting how wrong he’s been about this.

you need the light of islam Bro. Log off and recite the shahada. 

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

So I get to pick, in god-like fashion whomever I want with no limits????

I am attempting to give realistic or potential options but if you just want me to start listing better QB's than Bryce, I can do that too.

It's a serious question regardless of electro's nonsense post. The limit is they have to be available net season. So they need to be a free agent or someone from the draft. Or, if there is a BU QB the Panther's could legitimately trade for. SO it needs to be realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cranky said:

It's a serious question regardless of electro's nonsense post. The limit is they have to be available net season. So they need to be a free agent or someone from the draft. Or, if there is a BU QB the Panther's could legitimately trade for. SO it needs to be realistic.

Placing made up restrictions on speculation about replacing a midget we made the worst trade in thirty years for. Powerful. 

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • On offense, QB and RB are a thing. QB needs to improve a fair amount, and the RBs have me unsure if they can match last year’s  level. Brooks being the big mystery. It seems like they think he is good to go, they didn’t do that much to ad insurance.    You have to think the defense will be better. We are young in a lot of places and can hope for some growth from a few guys, as the season progresses.    I think other teams in our division helped themselves too though. Every single one of them picked in front of us for three days and took players we might have taken over who was there for us.  
    • ??? Trevin is a lot of things, but slow is not one of them.
    • I'm holding out hope for Wallace and I feel like Dan wants this LB to hit. I still feel like Edgerrin Cooper was "their guy" and he got sniped from the FO. They also chose Wallace over Payton Wilson, so I think there's some ego there from the former LB. I also think Wallace has had some pretty mid partners the past two years. Josey, Rozeboom, and a bunch of PS/journeymen haven't helped his case.  We probably thought he could be "the guy" at ILB but he's shown that's not the case. Now the question is, can he be a "Robin" to Lloyd's "Batman".  As for Cherillus, I like him as a depth guy and have never thought of him as a starter. He flashed a number of times last year. Bam Martin-Scott is another depth/PS guy that we drafted with the hopes he could step up given the opportunity. He's the exact same build, 2 years younger than Cherelus and produced similar stats last year.  Iron sharpens iron. Let's go gents....time to step up or show yourself out. 
×
×
  • Create New...