Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Kaye: “I would keep a pretty close eye on {KC Concepcion}.”


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Cooper is a slot receiver and though we need one the 1st round is too high. The tackles are deep in the 1st round but after that it's just guys converting to guard in the nfl. I think there are 4 true tackle prospects on day 1 so it will depend on who's left when we pick. If none of them are then I would consider CB or S as that is probably the best available for us and helps the team more than a slot receiver at this time. 

Here…here! 
Bill Murray Yes GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/2/2026 at 10:24 AM, Jon Snow said:

I'm not sold on their ability to do much of anything. The only FO person I have faith in is Tillis. Dan and Dave still has some work to do to impress me or give me the faith that they can turn the team around. 

I think this is where I'm at too. I'd say the turnaround really started once Tillis got a bigger voice in the room. All of a sudden we started making better draft picks and personnel moves. Which is why I didn't want to lose him to the Falcons.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, XClown1986 said:

I think this is where I'm at too. I'd say the turnaround really started once Tillis got a bigger voice in the room. All of a sudden we started making better draft picks and personnel moves. Which is why I didn't want to lose him to the Falcons.

I think he's the decenting voice in the room that keeps them in check when he can. He tells them the consequences of every decision from a financial and team building perspective that has long been missing in the building. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

The way I see it is they will have to decide when they want to address the tackles. I would prefer they do it this draft and use next year's 1st on qb. If they don't do it this draft that means they plan to next year which takes qb off the table. 

Yeah except the QB could throw a curve ball they would have to swing at. If he flops this year are they really thinking a T will fix it?  They better be thinking a QB will fix it. This is why a proactive OL stance serves our interests. 
 

Another variable is that next year, all these QBs might push a lot of great players down the draft order. If somehow QB is covered, it could be good for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, strato said:

Yeah except the QB could throw a curve ball they would have to swing at. If he flops this year are they really thinking a T will fix it?  They better be thinking a QB will fix it. This is why a proactive OL stance serves our interests. 
 

Another variable is that next year, all these QBs might push a lot of great players down the draft order. If somehow QB is covered, it could be good for us. 

They better hope they've answered the qb situation. If not they will have to hope that there's a loaded tackle class next year. They have a lot to think about between now and when they are on the clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...