Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Look at the WRs in recent drafts around 19


Recommended Posts

2016
Corey Coleman (No. 15, Browns)
Will Fuller (No. 21, Texans)
Josh Doctson (No. 22, Commanders)
Laquon Treadwell (No. 23, Vikings)

2017
Corey Davis (No. 5, Titans)
Mike Williams (No. 7, Chargers)
John Ross (No. 9, Bengals)

2018
D.J. Moore (No. 24, Panthers)
Calvin Ridley (No. 26, Falcons)

2019
Marquise Brown (No. 25, Ravens)
N’Keal Harry (No. 32, Patriots)

2020
Henry Ruggs (No. 12, Raiders)
Jerry Jeudy (No. 15, Broncos)
CeeDee Lamb (No. 17, Cowboys)
Jalen Reagor (No. 21, Eagles)
Justin Jefferson (No. 22, Vikings)
Brandon Aiyuk (No. 25, 49ers)

2021
Ja’Marr Chase (No. 5, Bengals)
Jaylen Waddle (No. 6, Dolphins)
DeVonta Smith (No. 10, Eagles)
Kadarius Toney (No. 20, Giants)
Rashod Bateman (No. 27, Ravens)

2022

Drake London (No. 8, Falcons)
Garrett Wilson (No. 10, Jets)
Chris Olive (No. 11, Saints)
Jameson Williams (No. 12, Lions)
Jahan Dotson (No. 16, Commanders)
Treylon Burks (No. 18, Titans)

2023
Jaxon Smith-Njigba (No. 20, Seahawks)
Quentin Johnson (No. 21, Chargers)
Zay Flowers (No. 22, Ravens)
Jordan Addison (No. 23, Vikings)

2024
Marvin Harrison Jr. (No. 4, Cardinals)
Malik Nabers (No. 6, Giants)
Rome Odense (No. 9, Bears)
Brian Thomas Jr. (No. 23, Jaguars)
Xavier Worthy (No. 28, Chiefs)
Ricky Pearsall (No. 31, 49ers)
Xavier Legette (No. 32, Panthers)

2025

Emeka Egbuka, Ohio State | Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Round 1, Pick 19

Matthew Golden, Texas | Green Bay Packers

Round 1, Pick 23

 

 

JJ was the best WR for a couple years, JSN was 20th and just signed a 42.5 million per deal. Ravens love Flowers. Egbuka was a strong OROY pick

 

Seems like a great spot with these recent picks.......Best value has been WR....

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Each draft is different and you cannot use a previous draft to predict the value of positions in the current draft. It doesn't work that way.

I was pointing out the caliber of player available at 19, man WR has some of the best that came from that zone. Even Ceedee Lamb at 17, he's a stud. 

2025, 2024, 2020, 2023 all recent years all had great pay back in value terms. 

There will be around 4 WR available that the rank has them in the 19 range. Besides the OSU WR, so the #2 ranked WR maybe there for taking and recent drafts show he could be elite. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I was pointing out the caliber of player available at 19, man WR has some of the best that came from that zone. Even Ceedee Lamb at 17, he's a stud. 

2025, 2024, 2020, 2023 all recent years all had great pay back in value terms. 

There will be around 4 WR available that the rank has them in the 19 range. Besides the OSU WR, so the #2 ranked WR maybe there for taking and recent drafts show he could be elite. 

Just because they are ranked high among their class doesn't mean it's a good class. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Just because they are ranked high among their class doesn't mean it's a good class. 

I think the WR is among the top 1/3 compared to other groups. It would be about where a run is started, imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, BEASTfromdaEAST said:

And Amon Ra St. Brown was a 4th rounder it's all irrelevant.....

This year crop on WR seems pretty deep and if we draft a WR 3yrs running in the 1st RD that's some pathetic sh*t not being able to find talent elsewhere 

I agree. Especially with an offensive HC and OC with their roots in WRs. 
 

Coker alone shows you that you don’t need to shop in the high end boutique section. 

Edited by strato
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BEASTfromdaEAST said:

And Amon Ra St. Brown was a 4th rounder it's all irrelevant.....

This year crop on WR seems pretty deep and if we draft a WR 3yrs running in the 1st RD that's some pathetic sh*t not being able to find talent elsewhere 

B.S. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TD alt said:

B.S. 

Nice elaboration

I still believe you cant keep investing that type of draft capital in a position dependent on a QB that cant carry the team. BY nor this team is built like that. 

Not to mention not a single team in the HISTORY of the NFL has drafted WR in the 1st rd in 3 consecutive years! Would a Tepper led team be the dumbest and first to do it? Possibly unfortunately

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really really dobt care if they drsft another receiver in the first. If he's  BPA, YOU DO IT!

Whether of not you like Bryce, the team needs playmaker. Better to have them regardless whom is the QB. 

Can't believe I'm reading we shouldn't draft offensive playmaker because of Bryce. I understand you dont like him, but openly rooting for him to fail is horrible. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The WR class this year is not that impressive at the top but is very deep.  Therefor, we would be better served saving the wr pick this year for later rounds where we can still get some quality.  I could see us pulling the trigger on Lemon if he drops.  Tate won't be there and Tyson has that injury history.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BEASTfromdaEAST said:

Nice elaboration

I still believe you cant keep investing that type of draft capital in a position dependent on a QB that cant carry the team. BY nor this team is built like that. 

Not to mention not a single team in the HISTORY of the NFL has drafted WR in the 1st rd in 3 consecutive years! Would a Tepper led team be the dumbest and first to do it? Possibly unfortunately

Detroit drafted receiver's in the 1st round like 4 or 5 years in a row and got 1 receiver out of it. The GM was fired for that stupidity and he was a former player for them as well. Sound familiar. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...